E. Blyth

785 total citations
25 papers, 512 citations indexed

About

E. Blyth is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Blyth has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 512 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 13 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in E. Blyth's work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (20 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (12 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers). E. Blyth is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Technologies (20 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (12 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers). E. Blyth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Singapore. E. Blyth's co-authors include Lucy Frith, Marilyn Crawshaw, Wynne E. Norton, Allan Pacey, Frances Rapport, Lorraine Culley, Nicky Hudson, Olga van den Akker, Christine Cameron and M. S. Paul and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive BioMedicine Online.

In The Last Decade

E. Blyth

25 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. Blyth United Kingdom 13 429 279 131 91 83 25 512
Zeynep B. Gürtin United Kingdom 12 412 1.0× 155 0.6× 155 1.2× 57 0.6× 131 1.6× 18 492
T. Freeman United Kingdom 9 488 1.1× 290 1.0× 102 0.8× 130 1.4× 102 1.2× 12 544
Sophie Zadeh United Kingdom 15 333 0.8× 156 0.6× 54 0.4× 135 1.5× 101 1.2× 30 503
Kirstin Mac Dougall United States 7 356 0.8× 260 0.9× 126 1.0× 110 1.2× 60 0.7× 8 399
Tabitha Freeman United Kingdom 14 469 1.1× 266 1.0× 93 0.7× 159 1.7× 87 1.0× 18 558
Samantha Yee Canada 15 490 1.1× 197 0.7× 323 2.5× 64 0.7× 36 0.4× 36 556
Diane Beeson United States 8 163 0.4× 104 0.4× 52 0.4× 46 0.5× 37 0.4× 12 303
Emma Lycett United Kingdom 7 476 1.1× 335 1.2× 50 0.4× 257 2.8× 80 1.0× 8 551
Petra Nordqvist United Kingdom 15 562 1.3× 152 0.5× 81 0.6× 101 1.1× 193 2.3× 31 654
Elly Teman Israel 9 201 0.5× 62 0.2× 30 0.2× 55 0.6× 78 0.9× 24 307

Countries citing papers authored by E. Blyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Blyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Blyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Blyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Blyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Blyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Blyth. The network helps show where E. Blyth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Blyth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Blyth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Blyth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Blyth. E. Blyth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Johnson, Louise, E. Blyth, & Karin Hammarberg. (2014). Barriers for domestic surrogacy and challenges of transnational surrogacy in the context of Australians undertaking surrogacy in India.. PubMed. 22(1). 136–54. 4 indexed citations
3.
Lui, Su, et al.. (2014). Infertility patients’ motivations for and experiences of cross border reproductive services (CBRS): a partial trans-theoretical model. Fertility and Sterility. 102(3). e58–e58. 1 indexed citations
4.
Akker, Olga van den, Marilyn Crawshaw, E. Blyth, & Lucy Frith. (2014). Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register. Human Reproduction. 30(1). 111–121. 43 indexed citations
5.
Lam, C. W. K. & E. Blyth. (2012). Re-Engagement and Negotiation in a Changing Political and Economic Context: Social Work in Hong Kong. The British Journal of Social Work. 44(1). 44–62. 17 indexed citations
6.
Blyth, E.. (2012). Guidelines for infertility counselling in different countries: Is there an emerging trend?. Human Reproduction. 27(7). 2046–2057. 43 indexed citations
7.
Blyth, E.. (2012). Discovering the 'Facts of Life' Following Anonymous Donor Insemination. International Journal of Law Policy and the Family. 26(2). 143–161. 28 indexed citations
8.
Lee, Geok Ling, E. Blyth, & Clw Chan. (2012). Understanding the patterns of adjustment to infertility of IVF users using narrative and autobiographical timeline. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. 1(2). 125–134. 8 indexed citations
9.
Culley, Lorraine, Nicky Hudson, Frances Rapport, et al.. (2011). Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travellers. Human Reproduction. 26(9). 2373–2381. 84 indexed citations
10.
Frith, Lucy, E. Blyth, M. S. Paul, & Roni Berger. (2011). Conditional embryo relinquishment: choosing to relinquish embryos for family-building through a Christian embryo 'adoption' programme. Human Reproduction. 26(12). 3327–3338. 20 indexed citations
11.
Crawshaw, Marilyn, et al.. (2007). Past semen donors' views about the use of a voluntary contact register. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 14(4). 411–417. 28 indexed citations
12.
Daniels, K., E. Blyth, Marilyn Crawshaw, & Ruth Curson. (2005). Short Communication: Previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring. Human Reproduction. 20(6). 1670–1675. 36 indexed citations
13.
Blyth, E., Lucy Frith, & Allen Farrand. (2005). Is It Possible To Recruit Gamete Donors Who Are Both Altruistic and Identifiable?. Fertility and Sterility. 84. S21–S21. 4 indexed citations
14.
Blyth, E.. (2002). Subsidized IVF: the development of 'egg sharing' in the UK. Human Reproduction. 17(12). 3254–3259. 33 indexed citations
15.
Blyth, E.. (2001). Guidance for egg sharing arrangements: redefining the limits of information-giving in donor assisted conception. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 3(1). 45–47. 9 indexed citations
16.
Blyth, E.. (2001). The Impact of the First Term of the New Labour Government on Social Work in Britain: The Interface between Education Policy and Social Work. The British Journal of Social Work. 31(4). 563–577. 10 indexed citations
17.
Blyth, E.. (1999). The Social Work Role in Assisted Conception. The British Journal of Social Work. 29(5). 727–740. 9 indexed citations
18.
Blyth, E. & Jennifer Hunt. (1998). Sharing genetic origins information in donor assisted conception: views from licensed centres on HFEA donor information form (91) 4. Human Reproduction. 13(11). 3274–3277. 16 indexed citations
19.
Blyth, E. & Christine Cameron. (1998). The welfare of the child. An emerging issue in the regulation of assisted conception. Human Reproduction. 13(9). 2339–2342. 22 indexed citations
20.
Blyth, E.. (1993). Book Reviews. The British Journal of Social Work. 23(5). 545–546. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Zeynep B. Gürtin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Freeman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sophie Zadeh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kirstin Mac Dougall Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tabitha Freeman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Samantha Yee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Diane Beeson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emma Lycett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Petra Nordqvist Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elly Teman
Rankless by CCL
2026