E. Blyth

785 citations
25 papers · 512 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

E. Blyth

25 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

E. Blyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Reproductive Medicine 429
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 279
  • Gender Studies 83
  • Demography 91
  • Safety Research 49
Replace Zeynep B. Gürtin with:
Zeynep B. Gürtin United Kingdom
T. Freeman United Kingdom
Kirstin Mac Dougall United States
Sophie Zadeh United Kingdom
Tabitha Freeman United Kingdom
Sharmila Rudrappa United States
Emma Lycett United Kingdom
Samantha Yee Canada
Diane Beeson United States
Petra Nordqvist United Kingdom
E. Blyth relative to Zeynep B. Gürtin United Kingdom Zeynep B. Gürtin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Zeynep B. Gürtin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Blyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Blyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Blyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Blyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Blyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Blyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Blyth. The network helps show where E. Blyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Blyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Blyth Line = papers co-authored together E. Blyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201184
2 200951
3 201443
4 201243
5 200536
6 200233
7 200728
8 201228
9 199822
10 201120
11 201119
12 201217
13 199816
14 201712
15 200110
16 20019
17 19999
18 20159
19 20128
20
Barriers for domestic surrogacy and challenges of transnational surrogacy in the context of Australians undertaking surrogacy in India.
20144

About E. Blyth

E. Blyth is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Demography and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (20 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (12 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (4 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (429 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (279 citations), Gender Studies (83 citations), Demography (91 citations) and Safety Research (49 citations). E. Blyth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Frith, Marilyn Crawshaw, Wynne E. Norton, Frances Rapport, Nicky Hudson, Lorraine Culley, Allan Pacey, Olga van den Akker, Christine Cameron and M. S. Paul. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, The British Journal of Social Work, Fertility and Sterility, Reproductive BioMedicine Online and Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact