Kylie Baldwin

608 total citations
12 papers, 446 citations indexed

About

Kylie Baldwin is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kylie Baldwin has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 446 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Kylie Baldwin's work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (9 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers). Kylie Baldwin is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Technologies (9 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers). Kylie Baldwin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Switzerland. Kylie Baldwin's co-authors include Lorraine Culley, Nicky Hudson, Helene Mitchell, Stuart Lavery and Douglas Gray and has published in prestigious journals such as Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Sociology of Health & Illness and Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Kylie Baldwin

12 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kylie Baldwin United Kingdom 9 403 301 106 51 41 12 446
Aditya Bharadwaj Switzerland 10 181 0.4× 66 0.2× 75 0.7× 91 1.8× 12 0.3× 18 325
Uschi Van den Broeck Belgium 7 544 1.3× 106 0.4× 364 3.4× 44 0.9× 49 1.2× 11 592
T. Freeman United Kingdom 9 488 1.2× 102 0.3× 290 2.7× 102 2.0× 50 1.2× 12 544
Kirstin Mac Dougall United States 7 356 0.9× 126 0.4× 260 2.5× 60 1.2× 26 0.6× 8 399
An Ravelingien Belgium 10 164 0.4× 54 0.2× 95 0.9× 36 0.7× 19 0.5× 24 250
Imogen Goold United Kingdom 6 128 0.3× 119 0.4× 71 0.7× 19 0.4× 14 0.3× 22 204
Edgar Dahl Germany 11 190 0.5× 48 0.2× 158 1.5× 218 4.3× 10 0.2× 31 326
Patricia P. Mahlstedt United States 6 479 1.2× 66 0.2× 309 2.9× 38 0.7× 71 1.7× 9 521
Giuliana Fuscaldo Australia 9 180 0.4× 150 0.5× 111 1.0× 10 0.2× 8 0.2× 26 253
Marcin Smietana United Kingdom 7 222 0.6× 30 0.1× 60 0.6× 89 1.7× 15 0.4× 11 250

Countries citing papers authored by Kylie Baldwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kylie Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kylie Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kylie Baldwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kylie Baldwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kylie Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kylie Baldwin. The network helps show where Kylie Baldwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kylie Baldwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kylie Baldwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kylie Baldwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kylie Baldwin. Kylie Baldwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
2.
Baldwin, Kylie. (2019). Egg Freezing, Fertility and Reproductive Choice: Negotiating Responsibility, Hope and Modern Motherhood. 15 indexed citations
3.
Baldwin, Kylie. (2019). Egg Freezing, Fertility and Reproductive Choice. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University). 40 indexed citations
4.
Baldwin, Kylie, Douglas Gray, & Nicky Hudson. (2019). On Ice: The impact of vitrification on the use of eggs in fertility treatment. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences. 3(6). 713–717. 4 indexed citations
5.
Hudson, Nicky, et al.. (2019). Reproduction research: From complexity to methodological innovation. Methodological Innovations. 12(1). 1 indexed citations
6.
Baldwin, Kylie. (2019). The biomedicalisation of reproductive ageing: reproductive citizenship and the gendering of fertility risk. Health Risk & Society. 21(5-6). 268–283. 17 indexed citations
7.
Baldwin, Kylie, Lorraine Culley, Nicky Hudson, & Helene Mitchell. (2018). Running out of time: exploring women’s motivations for social egg freezing. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 40(2). 166–173. 81 indexed citations
8.
Baldwin, Kylie. (2018). Conceptualising women's motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay. Sociology of Health & Illness. 40(5). 859–873. 57 indexed citations
9.
Baldwin, Kylie & Lorraine Culley. (2018). Women’s experience of social egg freezing: perceptions of success, risks, and ‘going it alone’. Human Fertility. 23(3). 186–192. 32 indexed citations
11.
Baldwin, Kylie, Lorraine Culley, Nicky Hudson, Helene Mitchell, & Stuart Lavery. (2015). Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 31(2). 239–245. 108 indexed citations
12.
Baldwin, Kylie, Lorraine Culley, Nicky Hudson, & Helene Mitchell. (2014). Reproductive technology and the life course: Current debates and research in social egg freezing. Human Fertility. 17(3). 170–179. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026