Elizabeth Dennett

1.8k total citations
59 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Dennett is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Dennett has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Oncology, 16 papers in Surgery and 11 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Dennett's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (14 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (10 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (10 papers). Elizabeth Dennett is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (14 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (10 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (10 papers). Elizabeth Dennett collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and United States. Elizabeth Dennett's co-authors include Swee T. Tan, Nicholas D. L. Brougham, Diana Sarfati, Tony Blakely, Gordon Purdie, Sarah Hill, Jonathan Koea, Kevin Dew, Bridget Robson and Donna Cormack and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Dennett

53 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth Dennett New Zealand 21 735 401 330 210 160 59 1.3k
Paula R. Blasi United States 14 539 0.7× 155 0.4× 337 1.0× 102 0.5× 164 1.0× 37 1.3k
C S Thomson United Kingdom 20 932 1.3× 203 0.5× 241 0.7× 81 0.4× 275 1.7× 38 1.6k
Jessica R. Bauman United States 18 802 1.1× 215 0.5× 189 0.6× 94 0.4× 392 2.5× 106 1.3k
Michael P. Hopkins United States 27 397 0.5× 409 1.0× 508 1.5× 55 0.3× 166 1.0× 69 1.8k
Stefano Guzzinati Italy 20 786 1.1× 246 0.6× 417 1.3× 42 0.2× 415 2.6× 69 1.5k
Florian Scotté France 27 1.1k 1.5× 138 0.3× 395 1.2× 242 1.2× 459 2.9× 131 2.0k
İlhan Öztop Türkiye 23 766 1.0× 145 0.4× 309 0.9× 55 0.3× 303 1.9× 106 1.4k
Robert P. Eckstein Australia 25 340 0.5× 376 0.9× 604 1.8× 81 0.4× 373 2.3× 68 2.1k
Reed E. Drews United States 17 305 0.4× 225 0.6× 118 0.4× 131 0.6× 89 0.6× 43 1.0k
Victoria H. Coupland United Kingdom 22 766 1.0× 247 0.6× 591 1.8× 63 0.3× 657 4.1× 37 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Dennett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Dennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Dennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Dennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Dennett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Dennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Dennett. The network helps show where Elizabeth Dennett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Dennett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Dennett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Dennett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Dennett. Elizabeth Dennett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Hally, Kathryn, et al.. (2023). Volumetric assessment of fat graft retention over implant by MRI. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(1). 1–7. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gurney, Jason, Melissa McLeod, Doug Campbell, et al.. (2022). Understanding disparities in post-operative mortality for Indigenous patients. New Zealand Medical Journal. 135(1565). 104–112. 2 indexed citations
4.
Keating, John P., et al.. (2021). Brief report: Lymph node morphology in stage II colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE. 16(3). e0249197–e0249197. 2 indexed citations
5.
Gurney, Jason, Melissa McLeod, James Stanley, et al.. (2020). Postoperative mortality in New Zealand following general anaesthetic: demographic patterns and temporal trends. BMJ Open. 10(9). e036451–e036451. 13 indexed citations
6.
7.
Larsen, Peter, et al.. (2018). Systematic review of diagnostic pathways for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 30(9). 678–683. 8 indexed citations
8.
Larsen, Peter, et al.. (2018). Appropriateness of CT scans for patients with non-traumatic acute abdominal pain. British Journal of Radiology. 91(1088). 20180158–20180158. 5 indexed citations
9.
Harper, Simon, et al.. (2018). Patients requiring an acute operation: where are the delays in the process?. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 88(9). 865–869. 1 indexed citations
10.
Gunawardene, Ashok, et al.. (2018). Disease recurrence following surgery for colorectal cancer: five-year follow-up.. PubMed. 131(1469). 51–58. 13 indexed citations
11.
Parent, Éric, et al.. (2018). Effect of stabilization exercise on back pain, disability and quality of life in adults with scoliosis: a systematic review. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 54(5). 647–653. 20 indexed citations
12.
Gunawardene, Ashok, Elizabeth Dennett, & Peter Larsen. (2018). Prognostic value of multiple cytokine analysis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 10(1). 134–143. 24 indexed citations
13.
Larsen, Peter, et al.. (2017). Acute abdominal pain-changes in the way we assess it over a decade.. PubMed. 130(1463). 39–44. 21 indexed citations
14.
Sarfati, Diana, Jason Gurney, James Stanley, et al.. (2014). Cancer-specific administrative data–based comorbidity indices provided valid alternative to Charlson and National Cancer Institute Indices. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 67(5). 586–595. 64 indexed citations
15.
Gurney, Jason, Diana Sarfati, James Stanley, et al.. (2013). Unstaged cancer in a population-based registry: Prevalence, predictors and patient prognosis. Cancer Epidemiology. 37(4). 498–504. 22 indexed citations
16.
Dennett, Elizabeth, et al.. (2012). Becoming Sexually Active Again. Cureus.
17.
Shah, Ankit B., Diana Sarfati, Tony Blakely, June Atkinson, & Elizabeth Dennett. (2012). Trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates in New Zealand, 1981–2004. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 82(4). 258–264. 19 indexed citations
18.
Hill, Sarah, Diana Sarfati, Tony Blakely, et al.. (2010). Survival disparities in Indigenous and non-Indigenous New Zealanders with colon cancer: the role of patient comorbidity, treatment and health service factors. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 64(2). 117–123. 105 indexed citations
19.
Sarfati, Diana, Sarah Hill, Tony Blakely, et al.. (2009). The effect of comorbidity on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival from colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 9(1). 116–116. 91 indexed citations
20.
Carne, Peter, J. N. R. Frye, Andrew Kennedy‐Smith, et al.. (2004). Local Invasion of the Bladder With Colorectal Cancers: Surgical Management and Patterns of Local Recurrence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 47(1). 44–47. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026