Ruth Cross

1.2k total citations
34 papers, 733 citations indexed

About

Ruth Cross is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Cross has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 733 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Speech and Hearing and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Ruth Cross's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (5 papers) and Community Health and Development (3 papers). Ruth Cross is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (5 papers) and Community Health and Development (3 papers). Ruth Cross collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and United States. Ruth Cross's co-authors include Ebenezer Owusu‐Addo, Louise Warwick-Booth, James Woodall, Emmanuel Appiah-Brempong, Jane South, Paul Sarfo‐Mensah, Marcus Enoch, Sharon Tucker, Karina Kinsella and Edward A. Wynne and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Transport Policy.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Cross

30 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ruth Cross United Kingdom	10	207	187	117	83	79	34	733
Scott R. Rosas United States	16	481 2.3×	147 0.8×	189 1.6×	55 0.7×	55 0.7×	45	1.2k
Brad Crammond Australia	15	544 2.6×	94 0.5×	97 0.8×	181 2.2×	65 0.8×	20	1.1k
Mona C. Shediac‐Rizkallah United States	7	589 2.8×	79 0.4×	92 0.8×	75 0.9×	198 2.5×	9	1.1k
Marie Gaarder United States	11	204 1.0×	47 0.3×	118 1.0×	48 0.6×	144 1.8×	28	840
Christian Dagenais Canada	18	425 2.1×	125 0.7×	123 1.1×	31 0.4×	113 1.4×	94	977
Jerry Sternin United States	10	311 1.5×	37 0.2×	146 1.2×	47 0.6×	81 1.0×	11	1.0k
Leah Frerichs United States	21	515 2.5×	83 0.4×	105 0.9×	114 1.4×	59 0.7×	88	1.2k
Brett Inder Australia	19	281 1.4×	45 0.2×	100 0.9×	110 1.3×	33 0.4×	51	1.3k
David W. Lounsbury United States	19	661 3.2×	90 0.5×	163 1.4×	61 0.7×	50 0.6×	42	1.2k
Vincent T. Francisco United States	17	936 4.5×	135 0.7×	154 1.3×	104 1.3×	72 0.9×	46	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Cross

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Cross

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Cross. The network helps show where Ruth Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Cross

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Cross. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Cross based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Cross. Ruth Cross is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Miller, A., et al.. (2025). State education policies as a critical component of systemic SEL: Roger Weissberg’s vision and continuing impact. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 100135–100135.

Warwick-Booth, Louise, Ruth Cross, & Sarah Thompson. (2025). Coproducing a Mixed Methods Evaluation to Assess a Menopause Educational Intervention.

Warwick-Booth, Louise, Ruth Cross, & James Woodall. (2024). Obstacles to co-producing evaluation knowledge: power, control and voluntary sector dynamics. Evidence & Policy. 20(1). 1–18. 1 indexed citations

Adatara, Peter, et al.. (2023). ‘There is water available and so our hearts are at peace’: exploring the impact of access to safe water on women's subjective well-being in Ghana. Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development. 13(9). 735–748. 3 indexed citations

Cross, Ruth, Louise Warwick-Booth, & James Woodall. (2023). Health Promotion Ethics.

Warwick-Booth, Louise, et al.. (2022). ‘You’re not going to give a monkey’s chuff’: exploring co-production in the design of services for women who have experienced sexual violence. Perspectives in Public Health. 142(4). 231–236. 2 indexed citations

Enoch, Marcus, Ruth Cross, Sophie Taylor, et al.. (2020). Future local passenger transport system scenarios and implications for policy and practice. Transport Policy. 90. 52–67. 34 indexed citations

Cross, Ruth. (2020). Understanding the importance of concepts of health.. PubMed. 35(12). 61–65.

Cross, Ruth & Louise Warwick-Booth. (2018). Neoliberal salvation through a gendered intervention: A critical analysis of vulnerable young women's talk.. Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University). 29. 1 indexed citations

10.

Woodall, James, Louise Warwick-Booth, Jane South, & Ruth Cross. (2018). What makes health promotion research distinct?. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 46(20_suppl). 118–122. 12 indexed citations

11.

Woodall, James, et al.. (2018). Using peer research processes to understand strategies to support those with severe, multiple and complex health needs. Health Education Journal. 78(2). 176–188. 5 indexed citations

12.

Warwick-Booth, Louise & Ruth Cross. (2018). Global Health Studies: A Social Determinants Perspective. 1 indexed citations

13.

Cross, Ruth & Louise Warwick-Booth. (2016). Using storyboards in participatory research. Nurse Researcher. 23(3). 8–12. 21 indexed citations

14.

Cross, Ruth, et al.. (2016). Attitudes towards human papillomavirus vaccination among African parents in a city in the north of England: a qualitative study. Reproductive Health. 13(1). 97–97. 52 indexed citations

15.

Owusu‐Addo, Ebenezer & Ruth Cross. (2014). The impact of conditional cash transfers on child health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. International Journal of Public Health. 59(4). 609–618. 92 indexed citations

16.

Appiah-Brempong, Emmanuel, et al.. (2014). Motivational Interviewing Interventions and Alcohol Abuse among College Students: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Health Promotion. 29(1). e32–e42. 22 indexed citations

17.

Warwick-Booth, Louise, et al.. (2013). Health Champions and Their Circles of Influence as a Communication Mechanism for Health Promotion. 3(2). 113–129. 3 indexed citations

18.

Woodall, James, Louise Warwick-Booth, & Ruth Cross. (2012). Has empowerment lost its power?. Health Education Research. 27(4). 742–745. 51 indexed citations

19.

Cross, Ruth. (2005). Accident and Emergency nurses’ attitudes towards health promotion. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 51(5). 474–483. 35 indexed citations

20.

Cross, Ruth. (2004). Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Education Research. 20(2). 206–213. 333 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact