Critical Public Health

1.3k papers and 21.1k indexed citations

About

The 1.3k papers published in Critical Public Health in the last decades have received a total of 21.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Public Health usually cover General Health Professions (588 papers), Sociology and Political Science (288 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (204 papers) specifically the topics of Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (161 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (144 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Public Health are Deborah Lupton, David M. Evans, John Green, Ronald Labonté, Dennis Raphael, Kathleen LeBesco, Kirsten Bell, Darlene McNaughton, Yin Paradies and Olena Hankivsky.

In The Last Decade

Critical Public Health

1.1k papers receiving 18.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Critical Public Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Public Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Public Health.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Public Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Public Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Public Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Public Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026