Ruth Charlton

38 total papers · 2.7k total citations
26 papers, 486 citations indexed

About

Ruth Charlton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Charlton has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 486 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Genetics and 6 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Ruth Charlton's work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (6 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (5 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers). Ruth Charlton is often cited by papers focused on Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (6 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (5 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers). Ruth Charlton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Ruth Charlton's co-authors include Graham R. Taylor, Eamonn Sheridan, John Burn, Claire Taylor, David T. Bonthron, Ian Carr, Christopher M. Watson, Bruce E. Hayward, Michel De Vos and Laura A. Crinnion and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Charlton

25 papers receiving 483 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Ruth Charlton 242 181 169 119 88 26 486
SV Hodgson 233 1.0× 164 0.9× 176 1.0× 128 1.1× 225 2.6× 22 549
Salah Ebrahim 128 0.5× 103 0.6× 165 1.0× 51 0.4× 89 1.0× 33 446
K. Okui 317 1.3× 65 0.4× 118 0.7× 87 0.7× 51 0.6× 18 446
Stef van Lieshout 242 1.0× 71 0.4× 207 1.2× 159 1.3× 90 1.0× 11 515
Kristin Bosse 245 1.0× 57 0.3× 311 1.8× 56 0.5× 64 0.7× 24 524
Angelo Lonoce 354 1.5× 73 0.4× 167 1.0× 193 1.6× 69 0.8× 16 522
Carl Hilliker 222 0.9× 48 0.3× 107 0.6× 65 0.5× 62 0.7× 23 416
Jan‐Gowth Chang 260 1.1× 54 0.3× 106 0.6× 43 0.4× 90 1.0× 23 505
Judith A. Hobert 296 1.2× 59 0.3× 102 0.6× 58 0.5× 64 0.7× 15 482
Małgorzata Pieńkowska 281 1.2× 44 0.2× 95 0.6× 143 1.2× 129 1.5× 21 539

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Charlton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Charlton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Charlton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Charlton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Charlton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Charlton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Charlton. The network helps show where Ruth Charlton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Charlton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Charlton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Charlton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Charlton. Ruth Charlton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026