This map shows the geographic impact of Roy Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roy Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roy Nash more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roy Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roy Nash. The network helps show where Roy Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roy Nash
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roy Nash.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roy Nash based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roy Nash. Roy Nash is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nash, Roy. (2009). Science as a theoretical practice: a response to Gorard from a sceptical cleric. 5(2).2 indexed citations
Nash, Roy. (1980). Primary education in rural New Zealand: current issues and developments.. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. 15(1). 3–14.1 indexed citations
17.
Nash, Roy. (1976). Teacher expectations and pupil learning. Medical Entomology and Zoology.36 indexed citations
18.
Nash, Roy. (1973). Classrooms observed;: The teacher's perception and the pupil's performance. Medical Entomology and Zoology.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.