Roy Howat
Impact in
- Music top 1%
- Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Diverse Music Education Insights
- Diverse Musicological Studies
- Theater, Performance, and Music History
-
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
Papers in ⓘ
- Music 11
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 11
- Theater, Performance, and Music History 1
- Music History and Culture 1
- Diverse Musicological Studies 1
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies 1
- Co-authors
- John Rink (2 shared papers)Eric Clarke (1 shared paper)Edward T. Cone (1 shared paper)David Epstein (1 shared paper)Ralf Krampe (1 shared paper)Joel Lester (1 shared paper)William Rothstein (1 shared paper)Nicholas Cook (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Notes (3 papers)Music Analysis (2 papers)Music and Letters (1 paper)Musicology Australia (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Roy Howat
9 papers receiving 72 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Music 92
- Cognitive Neuroscience 60
- Signal Processing 30
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 47
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 9
Countries citing papers authored by Roy Howat
This map shows the geographic impact of Roy Howat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roy Howat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roy Howat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roy Howat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roy Howat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roy Howat. The network helps show where Roy Howat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Roy Howat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 54 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 23 | |
| 3 | Debussy in Proportion: A Musical Analysis | 1983 | 21 |
| 4 | 1992 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 6 | "Debussy in proportion. A musical analysis", Roy Howat, Cambridge 1983 : [recenzja] / Jadwiga Paja. | 1984 | 7 |
| 7 | The Art of French Piano Music: Debussy, Ravel, Fauré, Chabrier | 2009 | 6 |
| 8 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 11 | Preludes, book 1 : the autograph score | 1987 | 1 |
| 12 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 0 |
About Roy Howat
Roy Howat is a scholar working on Music, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Literature and Literary Theory, History and Education, having authored 14 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (11 papers), Literature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis (1 paper), Music Technology and Sound Studies (1 paper), French Literature and Poetry (1 paper), Theater, Performance, and Music History (1 paper), Music History and Culture (1 paper), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper) and Diverse Musicological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (92 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (60 citations), Signal Processing (30 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (47 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (9 citations). Roy Howat has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Rink, Eric Clarke, Edward T. Cone, David Epstein, Ralf Krampe, Joel Lester, William Rothstein, Nicholas Cook, Nicholas Temperley and Jim Samson. Their work appears in journals such as Notes, Music Analysis, Music and Letters, Musicology Australia and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.