Crime and Justice

475 papers and 29.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 475 papers published in Crime and Justice in the last decades have received a total of 29.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Crime and Justice usually cover Sociology and Political Science (400 papers), Clinical Psychology (124 papers) and General Health Professions (50 papers) specifically the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (264 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (223 papers) and Organized Crime and Criminal Networks Analysis (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Crime and Justice are David P. Farrington, Ronald V. Clarke, Daniel S. Nagin, Michael Tonry, Rolf Loeber, Tom R. Tyler, Lawrence W. Sherman, Francis T. Cullen, Robert J. Sampson and Philip J. Cook.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Crime and Justice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Crime and Justice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Crime and Justice.

Countries where authors publish in Crime and Justice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Crime and Justice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Crime and Justice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crime and Justice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025