Rosemary Hogg
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
-
- Blood transfusion and management 3
-
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 2
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 4
-
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 3
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 3
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery 2
- Nausea and vomiting management 1
-
- Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment 1
- Co-authors
- R. K. MirakhurSlavica KvolikJiabin LiuGoran KardumJaimo AhnRosemary C. PolomanoNabil ElkassabanyMarko Jukić
- Journals
- Anesthesia & Analgesia (1 paper)British Journal of Anaesthesia (1 paper)Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rosemary Hogg
11 papers receiving 104 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 30
- Biochemistry 20
- Internal Medicine 11
- Developmental Neuroscience 9
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 9
Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary Hogg
This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary Hogg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary Hogg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary Hogg. The network helps show where Rosemary Hogg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rosemary Hogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 9 | Physicians overestimate patient's knowledge of the process of informed consent: a cross-sectional study. | 2011 | 21 |
| 10 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 11 | Monitoring using acceleromyography: the dominant vs non-dominant hand | 2009 | 2 |
| 12 | 2009 | 12 |
About Rosemary Hogg
Rosemary Hogg is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Biochemistry and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Blood transfusion and management (3 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (30 citations), Biochemistry (20 citations) and Internal Medicine (11 citations). Rosemary Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. K. Mirakhur, Slavica Kvolik, Jiabin Liu, Goran Kardum, Jaimo Ahn, Rosemary C. Polomano, Nabil Elkassabany, Marko Jukić, Lu Cai and Samir Mehta. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.