Evie Gardner

28 papers receiving 764 citations

Peers

Evie Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Rehabilitation 180
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 74
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 113
  • Applied Psychology 48
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 42
Replace Noelia Galiano‐Castillo with:
Noelia Galiano‐Castillo Spain
Bei Li China
Dovilė Valančienė Lithuania
Nicola E Walsh United Kingdom
Alison M. Hoens Canada
Khalid Ibrahim Khoshhal Saudi Arabia
Christopher J. Gore Australia
Ümmühan Baş Aslan Türkiye
Linda Yin King Lee Hong Kong
Elizabeth K. Rasch United States
Evie Gardner relative to Noelia Galiano‐Castillo Spain Noelia Galiano‐Castillo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Noelia Galiano‐Castillo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Evie Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evie Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evie Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evie Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Evie Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evie Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evie Gardner. The network helps show where Evie Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Evie Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Evie Gardner Line = papers co-authored together Evie Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Power, effect and sample size using GPower: practical issues for researchers and members of research ethics committees
2007167
2 2012126
3 201292
4 201772
5 201665
6 201957
7 201945
8 201824
9 201723
10 201918
11 201317
12 201915
13 202113
14 201910
15 202010
16 20149
17 20209
18 20188
19 20218
20 20217

About Evie Gardner

Evie Gardner is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Ophthalmology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 821 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Exercise and Physiological Responses (3 papers), Blood transfusion and management (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper) and Music Therapy and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (180 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (74 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (113 citations), Applied Psychology (48 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (42 citations). Evie Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Suzanne McDonough, David G. Baxter, Chris Bleakley, Gareth W. Davison, J. Ty Hopkins, Daniel Francis McAuley, Ashley M Agus, Michael A. Matthay, Cecilia M. O’Kane and J. Stuart Elborn. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, The Bone & Joint Journal, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, BMJ Open and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact