Brian Roberson

1.6k citations
38 papers · 770 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Roberson

36 papers receiving 739 citations

Peers

Brian Roberson
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Safety Research 259
  • General Decision Sciences 50
  • Management Science and Operations Research 299
  • Economics and Econometrics 339
  • Political Science and International Relations 114
Replace Simon Wilkie with:
Simon Wilkie United States
Daniel G. Arce United States
Frank C. Zagare United States
Barry O’Neill United States
Sven Berg Sweden
Morton D. Davis United States
Theodore L. Turocy United Kingdom
Patrick D. Larkey United States
Lars Ehlers Canada
Michele Piccione United Kingdom
Brian Roberson relative to Simon Wilkie United States Simon Wilkie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Simon Wilkie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Roberson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Roberson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Roberson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Roberson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Roberson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Roberson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Roberson. The network helps show where Brian Roberson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Brian Roberson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Roberson Line = papers co-authored together Brian Roberson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006271
2 200949
3 201241
4 202037
5 198636
6 201235
7 200831
8 201226
9 201826
10 200925
11 200920
12 200817
13 201013
14 201213
15 201113
16 201713
17 200912
18 201211
19 201011
20 201511

About Brian Roberson

Brian Roberson is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Management Science and Operations Research and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 38 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (11 papers), Game Theory and Applications (8 papers), Economic theories and models (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (3 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (3 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (259 citations), General Decision Sciences (50 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (299 citations), Economics and Econometrics (339 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (114 citations). Brian Roberson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dan Kovenock, Daniel G. Arce, Barry Buzan, Rosemary Foot, Roman M. Sheremeta, Pierre Boyer, Kai A. Konrad, Richard Parsons and Oz Shy. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Theory, Mediterranean Politics, Journal of Theoretical Politics, Public Choice and Defence and Peace Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact