Rose M. Scott

4.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
38 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Rose M. Scott is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rose M. Scott has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 10 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Rose M. Scott's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (30 papers), Language Development and Disorders (13 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers). Rose M. Scott is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (30 papers), Language Development and Disorders (13 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers). Rose M. Scott collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and China. Rose M. Scott's co-authors include Renée Baillargeon, Zijing He, Cynthia Fisher, Vedant Parikh, Ronald A. Butow, Lin Bian, Erin Roby, Peipei Setoh, Alan M. Leslie and Hyun-joo Song and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Rose M. Scott

38 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

False-belief understanding in infants

2010 572 citations Renée Baillargeon, Rose M. Scott et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences profile →

Peers

Rose M. Scott

DEP

CN

SP

MB

ECP

Ágnes Melinda Kovács Hungary

Donna L. Mumme United States

Ansgar D. Endress United States

Dana Schneider Germany

Jonathan A. Slemmer United States

David C. Palmer United States

Zoe Liberman United States

Derek C. Penn United States

Laura Ann Petitto Canada

Sandeep Prasada United States

Ágnes Melinda Kovács Hungary

Rose M. Scott

1.3k ×0.9

DEP

838 ×1.1

CN

474 ×0.7

SP

31 ×0.1

MB

354 ×1.9

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Rose M. Scott Rose M. Scott (= 1×) peers Ágnes Melinda Kovács

Countries citing papers authored by Rose M. Scott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose M. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose M. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose M. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose M. Scott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose M. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose M. Scott. The network helps show where Rose M. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rose M. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rose M. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rose M. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rose M. Scott. Rose M. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Gerken, Alison R., et al.. (2025). Impacts of food, temperature, and humidity on recovery in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) after exposure to a contact pyrethroid insecticide. Journal of Insect Science. 25(2). 1 indexed citations

2.

Zhu, Tianhua & Rose M. Scott. (2025). Effects of group membership on adults' essentialism of ethnicity and SES. Acta Psychologica. 254. 104776–104776. 2 indexed citations

3.

Chang, Xin, et al.. (2025). Essentialist Beliefs About Status-Related Social Categories in China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 56(5). 492–510. 1 indexed citations

4.

Scott, Rose M., et al.. (2022). The influence of language input on 3-year-olds' learning about novel social categories. Acta Psychologica. 230. 103729–103729. 3 indexed citations

5.

Scott, Rose M., et al.. (2021). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning: Evidence from a low-income sample. First Language. 41(6). 677–700. 11 indexed citations

6.

Setoh, Peipei, Rose M. Scott, & Renée Baillargeon. (2020). Reply to Fenici and Garofoli: Why Would Toddlers Act on Low-Level Associations Only when Processing Demands Are Reduced?. Human Development. 64(1). 7–9. 2 indexed citations

7.

Roby, Erin & Rose M. Scott. (2018). The relationship between parental mental-state language and 2.5-year-olds’ performance on a nontraditional false-belief task. Cognition. 180. 10–23. 15 indexed citations

8.

Scott, Rose M. & Renée Baillargeon. (2017). Early False-Belief Understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 21(4). 237–249. 151 indexed citations

9.

Roby, Erin & Rose M. Scott. (2016). Think Fast! Mental-state Language is Related to the Speed of False-belief Reasoning in Adulthood.. Cognitive Science. 2 indexed citations

10.

Scott, Rose M.. (2016). Surprise! 20-month-old infants understand the emotional consequences of false beliefs. Cognition. 159. 33–47. 27 indexed citations

11.

Scott, Rose M., et al.. (2016). Finding meaning in a noisy world: exploring the effects of referential ambiguity and competition on 2·5-year-olds’ cross-situational word learning. Journal of Child Language. 44(3). 650–676. 13 indexed citations

12.

Roby, Erin & Rose M. Scott. (2016). Rethinking the Relationship between Social Experience and False-Belief Understanding: A Mentalistic Account. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 1721–1721. 9 indexed citations

13.

Scott, Rose M., et al.. (2015). Infants understand deceptive intentions to implant false beliefs about identity: New evidence for early mentalistic reasoning. Cognitive Psychology. 82. 32–56. 44 indexed citations

14.

Scott, Rose M. & Erin Roby. (2015). Processing Demands Impact 3-Year-Olds’ Performance in a Spontaneous-Response Task: New Evidence for the Processing-Load Account of Early False-Belief Understanding. PLoS ONE. 10(11). e0142405–e0142405. 17 indexed citations

15.

Cimpian, Andrei & Rose M. Scott. (2012). Children expect generic knowledge to be widely shared. Cognition. 123(3). 419–433. 33 indexed citations

16.

Scott, Rose M., Zijing He, Renée Baillargeon, & Denise D. Cummins. (2011). False‐belief understanding in 2.5‐year‐olds: evidence from two novel verbal spontaneous‐response tasks. Developmental Science. 15(2). 181–193. 59 indexed citations

17.

Scott, Rose M., Renée Baillargeon, Hyun-joo Song, & Alan M. Leslie. (2010). Attributing false beliefs about non-obvious properties at 18 months. Cognitive Psychology. 61(4). 366–395. 82 indexed citations

18.

Baillargeon, Renée, Rose M. Scott, & Zijing He. (2010). False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 14(3). 110–118. 572 indexed citations breakdown →

19.

Scott, Rose M. & Cynthia Fisher. (2009). Two-year-olds use distributional cues to interpret transitivity-alternating verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes. 24(6). 777–803. 64 indexed citations

20.

Fisher, Cynthia & Rose M. Scott. (2006). Automatic Classification of Transitivity Alternations in Child-Directed Speech. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact