Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Rom Harré's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rom Harré with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rom Harré more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rom Harré. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rom Harré. The network helps show where Rom Harré may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rom Harré
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rom Harré.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rom Harré based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rom Harré. Rom Harré is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Langenhove, Luk Van & Rom Harré. (2016). Posicionamiento y autobiografía: el relato de vida. Revista de educación. 77–96.1 indexed citations
2.
Harré, Rom, et al.. (2010). EMOCIONES Y DISCURSO: Una mirada a la narrativa científica de la construcción social del amor. Prisma social. 10.3 indexed citations
Brockmeier, Jens & Rom Harré. (2005). Die narrative Wende: Reichweite und Grenzen eines alternativen Paradigmas. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 29. 31–57.5 indexed citations
5.
Harré, Rom & Daniel Rothbart. (2004). Modeling : gateway to the unknown : a work. Elsevier eBooks.2 indexed citations
6.
Harré, Rom, et al.. (2002). Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis : zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft. Suhrkamp eBooks.68 indexed citations
Sabat, Steven R. & Rom Harré. (1994). The Alzheimer's Disease Sufferer as a Semiotic Subject. Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology. 1(3). 145–160.63 indexed citations
10.
Harré, Rom & Roy Harris. (1993). Linguistics and Philosophy: The Controversial Interface. Pergamon Press eBooks.8 indexed citations
11.
Harré, Rom. (1992). Tipos corporales: categorías y caracteres. Revista de occidente. 111–136.1 indexed citations
12.
Harré, Rom & Roy Bhaskar. (1990). Harré and His Critics: Essays in Honour of Rom Harré with His Commentary on Them.9 indexed citations
13.
Harré, Rom. (1987). El gamberrismo en el fútbol. Revista de occidente. 55–78.3 indexed citations
14.
Harré, Rom & Roger Lamb. (1986). The Dictionary of ethology and animal learning. Blackwell eBooks.8 indexed citations
15.
Harré, Rom, et al.. (1986). The dictionary of developmental and educational psychology.6 indexed citations
16.
Harré, Rom, Roger Lamb, Dennis Gath, Linda P. Spear, & Norman E. Spear. (1986). The dictionary of physiological and clinical psychology. Blackwell eBooks.7 indexed citations
17.
Harré, Rom. (1985). The philosophies of science. Oxford University Press eBooks.157 indexed citations
18.
Jensen, Uffe Juul & Rom Harré. (1981). The Philosophy of evolution. St Martin's Press eBooks.61 indexed citations
19.
Harré, Rom. (1963). The Concept and Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences.. 2. 172.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.