Foundations of Chemistry

437 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 437 papers published in Foundations of Chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Foundations of Chemistry usually cover Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (247 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (146 papers) and Organic Chemistry (68 papers) specifically the topics of History and advancements in chemistry (226 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (125 papers) and Various Chemistry Research Topics (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Foundations of Chemistry are Eric R. Scerri, Olímpia Lombardi, Richard F. W. Bader, Pier Luigi Luisi, Keith S. Taber, Geoff Rayner‐Canham, Chérif F. Matta, Joseph E. Earley, Philip Stewart and José Antonio Chamizo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Foundations of Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Foundations of Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Foundations of Chemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Foundations of Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Foundations of Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Foundations of Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foundations of Chemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025