Rohan McWilliam
Impact in
- History top 5%
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Papers in
-
- Australian History and Society 6
- Decadence, Literature, and Society 3
- Irish and British Studies 3
-
- Cinema and Media Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Kelly Boyd (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Victorian Culture (4 papers)The English Historical Review (2 papers)Victorian Studies (2 papers)Social History (2 papers)Cultural and Social History (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Rohan McWilliam
22 papers receiving 89 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- History 44
- Museology 7
- Music 6
- Literature and Literary Theory 17
- Political Science and International Relations 31
Countries citing papers authored by Rohan McWilliam
This map shows the geographic impact of Rohan McWilliam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rohan McWilliam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rohan McWilliam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rohan McWilliam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rohan McWilliam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rohan McWilliam. The network helps show where Rohan McWilliam may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Rohan McWilliam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 56 | |
| 2 | The Tichborne Claimant: a Victorian sensation | 2007 | 17 |
| 3 | 2000 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1963 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 1 |
About Rohan McWilliam
Rohan McWilliam is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Music, Literature and Literary Theory and History, having authored 29 papers that have together received 123 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (6 papers), Australian History and Society (6 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (5 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Decadence, Literature, and Society (3 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers) and Theatre and Performance Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (44 citations), Museology (7 citations), Music (6 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (17 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (31 citations). Rohan McWilliam has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kelly Boyd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Victorian Culture, The English Historical Review, Victorian Studies, Social History and Cultural and Social History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.