Kelly Boyd
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Stacy Tessler LindauJennifer A. MakelarskiRussell L. KnothBarry SingerElizabeth L. TungElbert S. HuangEmily AbramsohnChiahung Chou
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers)Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Kelly Boyd
25 papers receiving 307 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- General Health Professions 164
- Clinical Psychology 79
- Health 77
- Sociology and Political Science 54
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Kelly Boyd
This map shows the geographic impact of Kelly Boyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelly Boyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelly Boyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kelly Boyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelly Boyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelly Boyd. The network helps show where Kelly Boyd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kelly Boyd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kelly Boyd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kelly Boyd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kelly Boyd. Kelly Boyd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Novel Integration of Clinical Research Data Collection with Intervention Softwares: Implementation in Two Community Resource Referral Trials. | 1 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 66 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 63 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Kelly Boyd
Kelly Boyd is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 29 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (77 citations), General Health Professions (164 citations) and Clinical Psychology (79 citations). Kelly Boyd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Stacy Tessler Lindau, Jennifer A. Makelarski, Russell L. Knoth, Barry Singer, Elizabeth L. Tung, Elbert S. Huang, Emily Abramsohn, Chiahung Chou, David G. Beiser and Monica E. Peek. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, American Journal of Public Health and Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.