Anna M. Ehret

620 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 490 citations indexed

About

Anna M. Ehret is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna M. Ehret has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 490 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 1 paper in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Anna M. Ehret's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers). Anna M. Ehret is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers). Anna M. Ehret collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United States. Anna M. Ehret's co-authors include Matthias Berking, Jutta Joormann, Peter Kirsch, Wolfgang Hiller, Winfried Rief and Gerd Laux and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Cognition & Emotion and BMC Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Anna M. Ehret

6 papers receiving 480 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

DSM-IV und DSM-5: Was hat sich tatsächlich verändert?

2013 292 citations Anna M. Ehret, Matthias Berking Verhaltenstherapie profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna M. Ehret Germany	5	259	132	116	82	81	6	490
Rumiko Koda Japan	3	167 0.6×	131 1.0×	141 1.2×	122 1.5×	54 0.7×	6	488
Giulia Adavastro Italy	9	267 1.0×	75 0.6×	182 1.6×	89 1.1×	71 0.9×	11	560
Julie Karsten Netherlands	11	291 1.1×	259 2.0×	93 0.8×	115 1.4×	100 1.2×	19	571
Dahlia Mukherjee United States	10	161 0.6×	176 1.3×	115 1.0×	104 1.3×	77 1.0×	27	444
Ismail Cüneyt Güzey Norway	14	201 0.8×	112 0.8×	110 0.9×	64 0.8×	50 0.6×	31	442
José Antônio Alves Vilela Brazil	5	222 0.9×	110 0.8×	210 1.8×	80 1.0×	49 0.6×	8	509
Ömer Akil Özer Türkiye	14	241 0.9×	180 1.4×	176 1.5×	156 1.9×	54 0.7×	48	614
Andrea J. Weinstein United States	8	259 1.0×	159 1.2×	65 0.6×	96 1.2×	74 0.9×	14	508
Chung Tai Lee South Korea	14	226 0.9×	93 0.7×	141 1.2×	85 1.0×	86 1.1×	21	475
Klaus Georgi Germany	12	280 1.1×	98 0.7×	97 0.8×	81 1.0×	114 1.4×	20	515

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Ehret

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Ehret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Ehret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Ehret more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Ehret

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Ehret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Ehret. The network helps show where Anna M. Ehret may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna M. Ehret

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna M. Ehret. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna M. Ehret based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna M. Ehret. Anna M. Ehret is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Ehret, Anna M., Jutta Joormann, & Matthias Berking. (2017). Self-compassion is more effective than acceptance and reappraisal in decreasing depressed mood in currently and formerly depressed individuals. Journal of Affective Disorders. 226. 220–226. 30 indexed citations

2.

Ehret, Anna M., et al.. (2017). From the neurobiological basis of comorbid alcohol dependence and depression to psychological treatment strategies: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 17(1). 153–153. 16 indexed citations

3.

Ehret, Anna M., et al.. (2014). Reducing symptoms of major depressive disorder through a systematic training of general emotion regulation skills: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 14(1). 20–20. 18 indexed citations

4.

Ehret, Anna M., Jutta Joormann, & Matthias Berking. (2014). Examining risk and resilience factors for depression: The role of self-criticism and self-compassion. Cognition & Emotion. 29(8). 1496–1504. 130 indexed citations

5.

Ehret, Anna M. & Matthias Berking. (2013). DSM-IV und DSM-5: Was hat sich tatsächlich verändert?. Verhaltenstherapie. 23(4). 258–266. 292 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Laux, Gerd & Anna M. Ehret. (1983). [Heller syndrome: a particular case study].. PubMed. 54(11). 604–6. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact