Countries citing papers authored by Birger Hjørland
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Birger Hjørland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birger Hjørland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birger Hjørland more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birger Hjørland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birger Hjørland. The network helps show where Birger Hjørland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Birger Hjørland
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Birger Hjørland.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Birger Hjørland based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Birger Hjørland. Birger Hjørland is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hjørland, Birger. (2013). Theories of knowledge organization — theories of knowledge:Keynote March 19, 2013. 13th Meeting of the German ISKO in Potsdam. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).1 indexed citations
8.
Hjørland, Birger & Jeppe Nicolaisen. (2010). The social psychology of information use: seeking "friends", avoiding "enemies".. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 15.3 indexed citations
9.
Hjørland, Birger. (2008). Book review of: Rachel Cooper. Classifying Madness: A Philosophical Examination of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Berlin: Springer, 2005.. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION.7 indexed citations
10.
Hjørland, Birger. (2007). Semantic and Knowledge Organization.. 367–405.5 indexed citations
11.
Hjørland, Birger. (2007). Arguments for 'the bibliographical paradigm' : some thoughts inspired by the new English edition of the UDC. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona).8 indexed citations
12.
Hjørland, Birger & Jeppe Nicolaisen. (2004). Scientific and Scholarly Classifications are not "Naïve": a Comment to Begthol (2003). Knowledge Organization, 31(1), 55-61.. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION.3 indexed citations
13.
Hjørland, Birger. (2004). Arguments for Philosophical Realism in Library and Information Science. Library trends. 52(3). 488–506.57 indexed citations
14.
Hjørland, Birger & Jenna Hartel. (2003). Introduction to the Special Issue of Knowledge Organization. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION. 30.4 indexed citations
15.
Hartel, Jenna & Birger Hjørland. (2003). Afterword: Ontological, Epistemological and Sociological Dimensions of Domains. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION. 30.26 indexed citations
16.
Hjørland, Birger. (2001). アバウトネス,主題,トピック,テーマ,領域,分野,コンテンツ等及び関連性に関する理論. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 52(9). 774–778.14 indexed citations
17.
Hjørland, Birger. (2000). Information seeking behaviour: what should a general theory look like?. 1. 19–33.12 indexed citations
18.
Hjørland, Birger & Hans‐Jørgen Albrechtsen. (1999). An analysis of some trends in classification research. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).22 indexed citations
Hjørland, Birger. (1991). Det kognitive paradigme i biblioteks- og informationsvidenskaben. (In Danish; Translated title: The cognitive paradigm in Library and Information Science). UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.