Roberto Percacci

5.5k citations
116 papers · 3.3k indexed · h-index 32

Roberto Percacci

113 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Roberto Percacci
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 3.1k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.3k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.5k
  • Mathematical Physics 126
  • Oceanography 106
Replace Frank Saueressig with:
Frank Saueressig Netherlands
Ignatios Antoniadis France
Joan Simón United Kingdom
Nobuyoshi Ohta Japan
Gianluca Calcagni Spain
Daniel Grumiller Austria
M. Quirós Spain
Tomasz R. Taylor United States
Clifford Cheung United States
Ana Achúcarro Spain
Roberto Percacci relative to Frank Saueressig Netherlands Frank Saueressig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Frank Saueressig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Percacci

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Percacci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Percacci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Percacci more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Percacci

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Percacci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Percacci. The network helps show where Roberto Percacci may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Percacci, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberto Percacci Line = papers co-authored together Roberto Percacci links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20253
2 20253
3 202412
4 20244
5 202418
6 202411
7 20241
8 202311
9 20214
10 20215
11 202016
12 202071
13 201916
14 201932
15 201825
16 20119
17 2006192
18
Should We Expect a Fixed Point for Newton's Constant?
200413
19
Why is the metric nondegenerate
19921
20 198260

About Roberto Percacci

Roberto Percacci is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Geometry and Topology, having authored 116 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (100 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (77 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (36 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (30 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (25 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (8 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (6 papers) and Advanced Differential Geometry Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (3.1k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.3k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.5k citations), Mathematical Physics (126 citations) and Oceanography (106 citations). Roberto Percacci has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Alessandro Codello, Gian Paolo Vacca, Pietro Donà, Astrid Eichhorn, Roberto Floreanini, Nobuyoshi Ohta, Ergin Sezgin, Christoph Rahmede, S. Randjbar‐Daemi and Omar Zanusso. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physical review. D, Nuclear Physics B and Journal of High Energy Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026