Roberta Kestenbaum

15 papers receiving 968 citations

Peers

Roberta Kestenbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 368
  • Clinical Psychology 409
  • Social Psychology 404
  • Pharmacy 80
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 343
Replace Elinor W. Ames with:
Elinor W. Ames Canada
Richard B. Kearsley United States
Marie‐Germaine Pêcheux France
Donald P. Marzolf United States
Janette B. Benson United States
Janet E. Frick United States
Janet Fletcher Australia
Nancy A. Myers United States
Melissa W. Clearfield United States
Claudia Thoermer Germany
Roberta Kestenbaum relative to Elinor W. Ames Canada Elinor W. Ames's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Elinor W. Ames · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberta Kestenbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberta Kestenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberta Kestenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberta Kestenbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberta Kestenbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberta Kestenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberta Kestenbaum. The network helps show where Roberta Kestenbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Roberta Kestenbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberta Kestenbaum Line = papers co-authored together Roberta Kestenbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1995229
2 1990201
3 1989172
4 1990112
5 199088
6 199280
7 198750
8
Les origines du concept d'objet
198639
9 199234
10 198932
11 198719
12 198712
13 19894
14 19922
15 19881
16 20130

About Roberta Kestenbaum

Roberta Kestenbaum is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spatial Cognition and Navigation (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Categorization, perception, and language (1 paper) and Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (368 citations), Clinical Psychology (409 citations), Social Psychology (404 citations), Pharmacy (80 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (343 citations). Roberta Kestenbaum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth S. Spelke, Charles A. Nelson, Megan R. Gunnar, Sarah Lang, Sarah C. Mangelsdorf, L. Alan Sroufe, Daniel J. Simons, Ellen A. Farber, Claes von Hofsten and Henry Gleitman. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Child Development, British Journal of Developmental Psychology and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact