Robert Wisnovsky
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Religious studies top 2%
- Islamic Thought and Society Studies
Papers in
-
- Islamic Thought and Society Studies 8
- Philosophy 15
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 15
- Co-authors
- Mohamed CherietJon McGinnisReza Farrahi MoghaddamMathias M. AdankonDeborah L. BlackStephen MennTony StreetPeter E. Pormann
- Journals
- Oriens (4 papers)Arabic Sciences and Philosophy (3 papers)Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies (1 paper)Journal of the American Oriental Society (1 paper)Quaestio (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Robert Wisnovsky
15 papers receiving 173 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Philosophy 150
- Religious studies 65
- Archeology 47
- Political Science and International Relations 81
- Social Psychology 58
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Wisnovsky
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Wisnovsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Wisnovsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Wisnovsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Wisnovsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Wisnovsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Wisnovsky. The network helps show where Robert Wisnovsky may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Robert Wisnovsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 8 | Sparse descriptor for lexicon reduction in handwritten Arabic documents | 2012 | 3 |
| 9 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 52 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 17 | Aspects of Avicenna | 2001 | 9 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15 |
About Robert Wisnovsky
Robert Wisnovsky is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Social Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Archeology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval and Classical Philosophy (15 papers), Islamic Thought and Society Studies (8 papers), Families in Therapy and Culture (8 papers), Islamic Studies and History (7 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 papers), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (3 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (2 papers) and Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (150 citations), Religious studies (65 citations), Archeology (47 citations), Political Science and International Relations (81 citations) and Social Psychology (58 citations). Robert Wisnovsky has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mohamed Cheriet, Jon McGinnis, Reza Farrahi Moghaddam, Mathias M. Adankon, Deborah L. Black, Stephen Menn, Tony Street, Peter E. Pormann, Amos Bertolacci and Peter Adamson. Their work appears in journals such as Oriens, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Journal of the American Oriental Society and Quaestio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.