Paul Thom
- Philosophy top 5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 8
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 7
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 2
- Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art 2
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 3
- Religious studies top 10%
-
- Theatre and Performance Studies 3
-
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 3
-
- Law in Society and Culture 3
- Co-authors
- Francis SparshottCatarina Dutilh NovaesMikko YrjönsuuriE. J. AshworthSara L. UckelmanStephen ReadGyula KlimaLydia Goehr
- Journals
- History and Philosophy of Logic (3 papers)Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (2 papers)Arabic Sciences and Philosophy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Paul Thom
26 papers receiving 98 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Philosophy 90
- History and Philosophy of Science 23
- Theoretical Computer Science 4
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27
- Religious studies 9
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Thom
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Thom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Thom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Thom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Thom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Thom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Thom. The network helps show where Paul Thom may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Paul Thom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1979 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1977 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1975 | 4 |
About Paul Thom
Paul Thom is a scholar working on Philosophy, Music, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History and Philosophy of Science and Religious studies, having authored 31 papers that have together received 129 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (8 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (7 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (3 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers) and Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (90 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (23 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (27 citations) and Religious studies (9 citations). Paul Thom has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Francis Sparshott, Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Mikko Yrjönsuuri, E. J. Ashworth, Sara L. Uckelman, Stephen Read, Gyula Klima and Lydia Goehr. Their work appears in journals such as History and Philosophy of Logic, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, Grazer Philosophische Studien and Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.