Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Stone
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Stone more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Stone. The network helps show where Robert W. Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert W. Stone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert W. Stone.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert W. Stone based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert W. Stone. Robert W. Stone is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stone, Robert W., Daniel M. Eveleth, & Lori Baker-Eveleth. (2019). The Influence of Social-Media Sites on Job-Seeker Intentions: Facebook, Linkedin, and Twitter. Social Media + Society. 8(2). 18–29.5 indexed citations
4.
Stone, Robert W., Lori Baker-Eveleth, & Daniel M. Eveleth. (2017). The Role of Aesthetics Influencing User Satisfaction with Recruitment Websites. 1(1). 76–92.4 indexed citations
Baker-Eveleth, Lori, et al.. (2006). Enabling Laptop Exams using Secure Software: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 17(4). 413–420.21 indexed citations
9.
Baker-Eveleth, Lori, et al.. (2006). Helping Students Adapt to Computer-Based Encrypted Examinations.. The EDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 29(3). 41–46.2 indexed citations
10.
Stone, Robert W. & David J. Good. (2004). Measuring Entrepreneurial Orientation in an Individualized Technology Context. Journal of business & entrepreneurship. 16(2). 1.5 indexed citations
11.
Henry, John W. & Robert W. Stone. (2001). The roles of computer self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and attribution theory in impacting computer system use. CSUSB ScholarWorks (California State University, San Bernardino). 10(1). 1.8 indexed citations
12.
Stone, Robert W.. (2000). Centertrack: an IP overlay network for tracking DoS floods. USENIX Security Symposium. 15–15.303 indexed citations
13.
Stone, Robert W., et al.. (2000). Using Information Systems as a Unifying Influence in an Integrated Business Curriculum. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11(1). 61–66.2 indexed citations
14.
Henry, John W. & Robert W. Stone. (1999). The effects of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy on end-user job control and stress. CSUSB ScholarWorks (California State University, San Bernardino). 8(1). 2.6 indexed citations
15.
Henry, John W. & Robert W. Stone. (1999). The Impacts of End-User Gender, Education, Performance, and System Use on Computer Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy. 25(1). 10–16.29 indexed citations
Hook, W. R., et al.. (1966). Examination of a Possible Flight Experiment to Evaluate AN Onboard Centrifuge as a Therapeutic Device. NASSP. 115. 245.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.