Robert W. Stone

2.8k total citations
96 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Robert W. Stone is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert W. Stone has authored 96 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Information Systems and Management, 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 18 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Robert W. Stone's work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (29 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (16 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (12 papers). Robert W. Stone is often cited by papers focused on Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (29 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (16 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (12 papers). Robert W. Stone collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Latvia. Robert W. Stone's co-authors include Lori Baker-Eveleth, John W. Henry, David J. Good, Nicholas A. Ash́ford, P. W. Wilson, Daniel M. Eveleth, Walter J. Dobrogosz, Jeffrey J. Bailey, John F. Murphy and Ronald C. Rutherford and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The Journal of Finance.

In The Last Decade

Robert W. Stone

88 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert W. Stone United States 24 591 425 338 337 217 96 2.0k
Beverly K. Kahn United States 11 380 0.6× 326 0.8× 127 0.4× 267 0.8× 143 0.7× 31 1.8k
Michael S. Scott Morton United Kingdom 19 291 0.5× 287 0.7× 130 0.4× 356 1.1× 152 0.7× 48 2.8k
Gobinda Chowdhury United Kingdom 25 230 0.4× 339 0.8× 158 0.5× 880 2.6× 82 0.4× 99 3.1k
Yao‐Hua Tan Netherlands 20 419 0.7× 619 1.5× 80 0.2× 475 1.4× 213 1.0× 156 1.9k
Jöerg Evermann Canada 20 212 0.4× 210 0.5× 190 0.6× 469 1.4× 189 0.9× 67 1.5k
Tung Bui United States 25 323 0.5× 607 1.4× 102 0.3× 444 1.3× 154 0.7× 96 2.5k
Arno Scharl Austria 22 539 0.9× 782 1.8× 63 0.2× 650 1.9× 215 1.0× 111 2.1k
Heungsun Hwang Canada 25 236 0.4× 337 0.8× 116 0.3× 292 0.9× 301 1.4× 98 2.4k
Robert R. Harmon United States 20 257 0.4× 516 1.2× 142 0.4× 100 0.3× 237 1.1× 69 1.6k
Frederico Cruz‐Jesus Portugal 23 336 0.6× 326 0.8× 38 0.1× 135 0.4× 62 0.3× 60 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Stone. The network helps show where Robert W. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert W. Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert W. Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert W. Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert W. Stone. Robert W. Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Eveleth, Daniel M., Robert W. Stone, & Lori Baker-Eveleth. (2024). Social media users trust in their most frequently used social media site. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies. 14(4). e202445–e202445.
2.
Baker-Eveleth, Lori, et al.. (2024). Exploring the Characteristics and Attitudes of Electronic Textbook Users and Nonusers. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 22(5). 15–25. 1 indexed citations
3.
Stone, Robert W., Daniel M. Eveleth, & Lori Baker-Eveleth. (2019). The Influence of Social-Media Sites on Job-Seeker Intentions: Facebook, Linkedin, and Twitter. Social Media + Society. 8(2). 18–29. 5 indexed citations
4.
Stone, Robert W., Lori Baker-Eveleth, & Daniel M. Eveleth. (2017). The Role of Aesthetics Influencing User Satisfaction with Recruitment Websites. 1(1). 76–92. 4 indexed citations
5.
Miller, Jon R., et al.. (2013). Evidence of Convergence to a Signaling Equilibrium for California Wine 2001-2005. 1–13. 2 indexed citations
6.
Comstock, G W, et al.. (2008). Cigarette Smoking and Changes in Respiratory Findings. American Journal of Epidemiology. 168(7). 802–809. 4 indexed citations
7.
Stone, Robert W., David J. Good, & Lori Baker-Eveleth. (2006). The impact of information technology on individual and firm marketing performance. Behaviour and Information Technology. 26(6). 465–482. 71 indexed citations
8.
Baker-Eveleth, Lori, et al.. (2006). Enabling Laptop Exams using Secure Software: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 17(4). 413–420. 21 indexed citations
9.
Baker-Eveleth, Lori, et al.. (2006). Helping Students Adapt to Computer-Based Encrypted Examinations.. ˜The œEDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 29(3). 41–46. 2 indexed citations
10.
Stone, Robert W. & David J. Good. (2004). Measuring Entrepreneurial Orientation in an Individualized Technology Context. Journal of business & entrepreneurship. 16(2). 1. 5 indexed citations
11.
Henry, John W. & Robert W. Stone. (2001). The roles of computer self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and attribution theory in impacting computer system use. CSUSB ScholarWorks (California State University, San Bernardino). 10(1). 1. 8 indexed citations
12.
Stone, Robert W.. (2000). Centertrack: an IP overlay network for tracking DoS floods. USENIX Security Symposium. 15–15. 303 indexed citations
13.
Stone, Robert W., et al.. (2000). Using Information Systems as a Unifying Influence in an Integrated Business Curriculum. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11(1). 61–66. 2 indexed citations
14.
Henry, John W. & Robert W. Stone. (1999). The effects of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy on end-user job control and stress. CSUSB ScholarWorks (California State University, San Bernardino). 8(1). 2. 6 indexed citations
15.
Henry, John W. & Robert W. Stone. (1999). The Impacts of End-User Gender, Education, Performance, and System Use on Computer Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy. 25(1). 10–16. 29 indexed citations
16.
Henry, John W. & Robert W. Stone. (1995). A structural equation model of job performance using a computer-based order entry system. Behaviour and Information Technology. 14(3). 163–173. 22 indexed citations
17.
Hokama, Y., et al.. (1990). Causitive toxin(s) in the death of two atlantic dolphins. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 4(6). 474–478. 7 indexed citations
18.
Reynolds, David W., et al.. (1989). Evaluation of a 2-Month Cooperative Ground-Based Silver Iodide Seeding Program. The Journal of Weather Modification. 21(1). 3 indexed citations
19.
Hook, W. R., et al.. (1966). Examination of a Possible Flight Experiment to Evaluate AN Onboard Centrifuge as a Therapeutic Device. NASSP. 115. 245. 1 indexed citations
20.
Stone, Robert W. & David Pearson. (1961). Notes. Are Organic Group Influences Additive in All Reactions of Aromatic Compounds?. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 26(1). 257–259. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026