Robert W. Motl

6.8k citations
179 papers · 5.2k indexed · h-index 40

Robert W. Motl

164 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Robert W. Motl
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Applied Psychology 854
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 535
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.2k
  • Physiology 1.5k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 617
Replace Audrey L. Hicks with:
Audrey L. Hicks Canada
Steriani Elavsky United States
James H. Rimmer United States
Markus Gerber Switzerland
Bradley J. Cardinal United States
Steven J. Petruzzello United States
Gregory M. Christenson United States
Uwe Pühse Switzerland
Steven P. Hooker United States
Shannon S. D. Bredin Canada
Robert W. Motl relative to Audrey L. Hicks Canada Audrey L. Hicks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Audrey L. Hicks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Motl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Motl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Motl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Motl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Motl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Motl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Motl. The network helps show where Robert W. Motl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert W. Motl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert W. Motl Line = papers co-authored together Robert W. Motl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20250
4 20242
5 20245
6 20242
7 20240
8 20241
9 20235
10 20238
11 20232
12 20224
13 20223
14 20225
15 20219
16 20205
17 201920
18 2017100
19 201629
20
Physical Fitness Assessment Across the Disability Spectrum in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis
20152

About Robert W. Motl

Robert W. Motl is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Applied Psychology, having authored 179 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (71 papers), Physical Activity and Health (32 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (27 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (23 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (20 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (20 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (18 papers) and Effects of Vibration on Health (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (854 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (535 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.2k citations). Robert W. Motl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Edward McAuley, Rod K. Dishman, Marsha Dowda, Ruth P. Saunders, Russell R. Pate, Bonnie G. Berger, Gwen Felton, Erin M. Snook, Dianne S. Ward and Deirdre Dlugonski. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, International Journal of MS Care, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Rehabilitation Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026