Robert S. Harper

1.2k citations
28 papers · 666 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Robert S. Harper

24 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

Robert S. Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • General Psychology 78
  • Social Psychology 150
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 69
  • History and Philosophy of Science 20
Replace Robert I. Watson with:
Robert I. Watson United States
Gardner Murphy United States
Theodore Mischel United States
Harold L. Raush United States
Anthony Storr United Kingdom
Frank Kessel United States
Anita Tenzer
Morton M. Hunt
Albert H. Yee United States
Margaret W. Matlin United States
Robert S. Harper relative to Robert I. Watson United States Robert I. Watson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert I. Watson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert S. Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert S. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert S. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert S. Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert S. Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert S. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert S. Harper. The network helps show where Robert S. Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Robert S. Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert S. Harper Line = papers co-authored together Robert S. Harper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973132
2 1952122
3 195759
4 195247
5 197542
6 195330
7 195430
8 198528
9 196227
10 201024
11 195119
12 195416
13 195315
14 195213
15 195913
16 196210
17 19519
18 19538
19 19578
20 19824

About Robert S. Harper

Robert S. Harper is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 28 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color perception and design (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper), Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (1 paper), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper) and Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (78 citations), Social Psychology (150 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (69 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (20 citations). Robert S. Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William A. Hillix, Melvin H. Marx, Stuart W. Cook, Morton Deutsch, Marie Jahoda, Anne Roe, Henri Piéron, J. Z. Young, Morris S. Viteles and Gardner Lindzey. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Psychology, Civil War history, The American Historical Review, Psychiatric Services and Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact