Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Morton M. Hunt Morton M. Hunt (= 1×)
peers
Seymour Parker
Countries citing papers authored by Morton M. Hunt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Morton M. Hunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morton M. Hunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morton M. Hunt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morton M. Hunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morton M. Hunt. The network helps show where Morton M. Hunt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Morton M. Hunt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Morton M. Hunt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Morton M. Hunt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Morton M. Hunt. Morton M. Hunt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1997). How Science Takes Stock: The Story of Meta-Analysis. Internet Archive (Internet Archive).179 indexed citations
4.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1992). Das Rätsel der Nächstenliebe: der Mensch zwischen Egoismus und Altruismus. Campus eBooks.1 indexed citations
5.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1991). Die Praxis der Sozialforschung: Reportagen aus dem Alltag einer Wissenschaft.
6.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1990). The Compassionate Beast: What Science Is Discovering About the Humane Side of Humankind. Medical Entomology and Zoology.14 indexed citations
Hunt, Morton M.. (1986). Profiles of Social Research: The Scientific Study of Human Interaction. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).10 indexed citations
11.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1982). The universe within : a new science explores the human mind. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).34 indexed citations
12.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1982). Research through deception.. PubMed. 66–67, 138, 140+.1 indexed citations
13.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1982). The universe within.31 indexed citations
14.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1977). The Divorce Experience.26 indexed citations
15.
Orthner, Dennis K. & Morton M. Hunt. (1976). Sexual Behavior in the 1970's. The Family Coordinator. 25(1). 95–95.145 indexed citations breakdown →
Hunt, Morton M.. (1966). The world of the formerly married. Medical Entomology and Zoology.50 indexed citations
18.
Hunt, Morton M., et al.. (1964). The talking cure : a concise and practical guide to psychoanalysis today. Harper & Row eBooks.
19.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1962). Her infinite variety : the American woman as lover, mate and rival. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).1 indexed citations
20.
Hunt, Morton M.. (1959). The natural history of love. Medical Entomology and Zoology.27 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.