Journal of Economic Methodology

731 papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 731 papers published in Journal of Economic Methodology in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Economic Methodology usually cover Economics and Econometrics (492 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (142 papers) and General Decision Sciences (136 papers) specifically the topics of Economic Theory and Institutions (355 papers), Economic theories and models (197 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Economic Methodology are Robert Sugden, Uskali Mäki, Geoffrey M. Hodgson, Mary S. Morgan, Chee Kian Leong, Arthur Schram, Sheila Dow, Jim Woodward, N. Emrah Aydınonat and Julian Reiss.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Economic Methodology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Economic Methodology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Economic Methodology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Economic Methodology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Economic Methodology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Economic Methodology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Economic Methodology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025