Anna Alexandrova
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Health Informatics top 5%
Papers in
-
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 3
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 6
- Co-authors
- Jess WhittlestoneRune NyrupStephen CaveDaniel M. HaybronJay OdenbaughRamesh RaghavanMark FabianRobert Northcott
- Journals
- Journal of Economic Methodology (3 papers)Journal of Happiness Studies (3 papers)Philosophy of Science (3 papers)Res Philosophica (2 papers)Perspectives on Psychological Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSouth Sudan
In The Last Decade
Anna Alexandrova
38 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- History and Philosophy of Science 180
- Health Informatics 45
- General Decision Sciences 56
- Safety Research 185
- Applied Psychology 85
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Alexandrova
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Alexandrova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Alexandrova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Alexandrova more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Alexandrova
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Alexandrova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Alexandrova. The network helps show where Anna Alexandrova may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Anna Alexandrova, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 57 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 55 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 19 | Psychosocial and health systems dimensions of cervical cancer screening in Bulgaria and Romania. Final report. | 2005 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 15 |
About Anna Alexandrova
Anna Alexandrova is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (12 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (180 citations), Health Informatics (45 citations), General Decision Sciences (56 citations), Safety Research (185 citations) and Applied Psychology (85 citations). Anna Alexandrova has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Jess Whittlestone, Rune Nyrup, Stephen Cave, Daniel M. Haybron, Jay Odenbaugh, Ramesh Raghavan, Mark Fabian, Robert Northcott, Polly Mitchell and Carl F. Craver. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Methodology, Journal of Happiness Studies, Philosophy of Science, Res Philosophica and Perspectives on Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.