Robert L. Durham

679 total citations
23 papers, 472 citations indexed

About

Robert L. Durham is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert L. Durham has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 472 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Robert L. Durham's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Robert L. Durham is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Robert L. Durham collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert L. Durham's co-authors include Sandy K. Wurtele, Dominique Simons, Charles C. Benight, Gail Ironson, Edith Greene, Corinne Cather, Hasker P. Davis, Michael J. Parsons, Frank Keller and Kelli J. Klebe and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Robert L. Durham

20 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert L. Durham United States	10	234	76	71	64	53	23	472
Robert L. Sadoff United States	12	418 1.8×	181 2.4×	56 0.8×	30 0.5×	106 2.0×	74	670
Stuart Vyse United States	11	159 0.7×	100 1.3×	94 1.3×	41 0.6×	202 3.8×	34	598
Joseph T. McCann United States	16	440 1.9×	125 1.6×	43 0.6×	73 1.1×	143 2.7×	40	571
Carla D. Chugani United States	11	181 0.8×	61 0.8×	54 0.8×	71 1.1×	79 1.5×	42	389
Jennifer Cox United States	16	450 1.9×	269 3.5×	52 0.7×	22 0.3×	150 2.8×	48	579
Bruce D. Forman United States	11	244 1.0×	124 1.6×	37 0.5×	28 0.4×	120 2.3×	28	421
David Pineda Spain	10	343 1.5×	107 1.4×	30 0.4×	103 1.6×	139 2.6×	45	459
Bethany A. Lohr United States	7	258 1.1×	178 2.3×	41 0.6×	109 1.7×	206 3.9×	7	535
Terri Roberton Australia	8	486 2.1×	137 1.8×	48 0.7×	100 1.6×	267 5.0×	10	676
Eveline van Vugt Netherlands	14	411 1.8×	182 2.4×	56 0.8×	29 0.5×	179 3.4×	26	752

Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Durham

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Durham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Durham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Durham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert L. Durham

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Durham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Durham. The network helps show where Robert L. Durham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert L. Durham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert L. Durham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert L. Durham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert L. Durham. Robert L. Durham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Durham, Robert L., et al.. (2020). In the Gap: Peer Support Group Experiences for Post-Graduate, Pre-Licensed Counseling Candidates. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision. 13(3). 9.

Abrams, Gene, et al.. (2019). EVALUATING THE BENEFITS OF PROVIDING ARCHIVED ONLINE LECTURES TO IN-CLASS MATH STUDENTS. Online Learning. 12(3-4).

Durham, Robert L., et al.. (2016). The development and initial psychometric validation of the eHealth readiness scale. Computers in Human Behavior. 65. 460–467. 12 indexed citations

Coolidge, Frederick L., et al.. (2011). Retrospective Assessments of Childhood Psychopathology by Adults and Their Parents. Psychology. 2(3). 162–168. 6 indexed citations

Simons, Dominique, Sandy K. Wurtele, & Robert L. Durham. (2008). Developmental experiences of child sexual abusers and rapists. Child Abuse & Neglect. 32(5). 549–560. 89 indexed citations

Durham, Robert L., et al.. (2008). THE EVOLUTION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF MULTI-SENSORY TEACHING TECHNIQUES IN ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS: THEORY AND. 5 indexed citations

Benight, Charles C., et al.. (2004). Development and psychometric validation of a domestic violence coping self‐efficacy measure (DV‐CSE). Journal of Traumatic Stress. 17(6). 505–508. 34 indexed citations

Durham, Robert L., et al.. (2002). . Sexual Abuse. 14(3). 267–276.

Davis, Hasker P. & Robert L. Durham. (2001). Economic and psychological experimental methodology: Separating the wheat from the chaff. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 24(3). 405–406. 2 indexed citations

10.

Keller, Frank, et al.. (1999). A Comparison of Computerized and Standard Versions of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 13(3). 303–313. 73 indexed citations

11.

Benight, Charles C., Gail Ironson, & Robert L. Durham. (1999). Psychometric properties of a hurricane coping self‐efficacy measure. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 12(2). 379–386. 57 indexed citations

12.

Cather, Corinne, Edith Greene, & Robert L. Durham. (1996). Plaintiff injury and defendant reprehensibility: Implications for compensatory and punitive damage awards.. Law and Human Behavior. 20(2). 189–205. 43 indexed citations

13.

Durham, Robert L.. (1994). Socio-Cognitive Development among Chicano and Anglo American College Students.. Journal of college student development. 35(3). 6 indexed citations

14.

Coolidge, Frederick L., et al.. (1994). On the Relationship of the Five-Factor Personality Model to Personality Disorders: Four Reservations. Psychological Reports. 75(1). 11–21. 44 indexed citations

15.

Durham, Robert L., et al.. (1979). Demographic Differences for Sexual Knowledge and Attitudes. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy. 5(2). 29–36. 2 indexed citations

16.

Parsons, Michael J., et al.. (1978). Developmental Stages in Children's Aesthetic Responses. Journal of Aesthetic Education. 12(1). 83–83. 37 indexed citations

17.

Durham, Robert L., et al.. (1974). Some problems with reaction time as a measure of memory search. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 4(5). 489–492. 1 indexed citations

18.

Durham, Robert L. & Jum C. Nunnally. (1973). The effects of low and high levels of vigilance on subsequent visual exploratory behavior in humans. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1(5). 313–315. 1 indexed citations

19.

Hodges, William F. & Robert L. Durham. (1972). Anxiety, ability, and digit span performance.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 24(3). 401–406. 13 indexed citations

20.

Durham, Robert L., et al.. (1971). The effects of levels of information conflict on visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics. 10(2). 93–96. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact