This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Green more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Green. The network helps show where Robert Green may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Green
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Green.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Green based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Green. Robert Green is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Green, Robert, N. M. Mahowald, B. L. Ehlmann, et al.. (2019). The Earth Surface Mineral Dust Source Investigation Planned for the International Space Station. EGUGA. 10660.3 indexed citations
3.
Green, Robert, Marit E. Meyer, Juan H. Agui, et al.. (2015). Characterization of Carbon Particulates in the Exit Flow of a Plasma Pyrolysis Assembly (PPA) Reactor. ThinkTech (Texas Tech University).1 indexed citations
4.
MacDorman, Karl F., et al.. (2014). Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Europe PMC (PubMed Central).1 indexed citations
5.
Green, Robert, R. Vijayakumar, & Juan H. Agui. (2014). Development of Test Protocols for International Space Station Particulate Filters. ThinkTech (Texas Tech University).3 indexed citations
6.
Green, Robert, et al.. (2013). Applied Project Learning Outcomes: Differences between United States and International Students. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5(1). 41–51.1 indexed citations
7.
Green, Robert, et al.. (2012). Differences Between and Influences on Male and Female Students' Applied Project Learning Outcomes. The Academy of Educational Leadership Journal. 16(2). 93.3 indexed citations
8.
Green, Robert, et al.. (2012). Experiential Learning: The Internship and Live-Case Study Relationship. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4(1). 13–23.22 indexed citations
9.
Green, Robert, et al.. (2012). Customer Loyalty: Influences on Three Types of Retail Stores' Shoppers. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5(1). 1–19.9 indexed citations
10.
Green, Robert, et al.. (2012). Applied Projects: Learning Outcome Differences between Senior and Sophomore-Junior Students.. 2.1 indexed citations
11.
Green, Robert & Hui-Chu Chen. (2010). SPOUSAL PURCHASING BEHAVIOR AS AN INFLUENCE ON BRAND EQUITY. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3(2). 1–17.
12.
Green, Robert, et al.. (2010). Creating Lifelong Learning Through Service Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2(1). 1–14.1 indexed citations
13.
Chen, Hui-Chu & Robert Green. (2009). MARKETING MIX AND BRANDING: COMPETITIVE HYPERMARKET STRATEGIES. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2(1). 17–34.8 indexed citations
Kerslake, Thomas, et al.. (1993). System performance predictions for Space Station Freedom's electric power system. Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. 8.2 indexed citations
19.
Green, Robert, et al.. (1993). Space Station Freedom electrical performance model. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 8.23 indexed citations
20.
Green, Robert. (1962). Zonal Relationships in Lower Mississippian Rocks of Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. 10(6). 292–307.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.