Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]
20121.9k citationsKarl F. MacDorman et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Karl F. MacDorman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Karl F. MacDorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karl F. MacDorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karl F. MacDorman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karl F. MacDorman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karl F. MacDorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karl F. MacDorman. The network helps show where Karl F. MacDorman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karl F. MacDorman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karl F. MacDorman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karl F. MacDorman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Karl F. MacDorman. Karl F. MacDorman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dutta, Haimonti, M. K. Bhuyan, Debanga Raj Neog, Karl F. MacDorman, & Rabul Hussain Laskar. (2023). Patient Assistance System Based on Hand Gesture Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 72. 1–13.10 indexed citations
MacDorman, Karl F. & Debaleena Chattopadhyay. (2016). Reducing consistency in human realism increases the uncanny valley effect; increasing category uncertainty does not. Publisher.2 indexed citations
MacDorman, Karl F., et al.. (2014). Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Europe PMC (PubMed Central).1 indexed citations
Pfaff, Mark S., et al.. (2009). Mega-Collaboration: The inspiration and development of an interface for large-scale disaster response.. International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management.4 indexed citations
14.
Belpaeme, Tony, Stephen J. Cowley, & Karl F. MacDorman. (2007). Symbol Grounding: Special issue of. Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems. 8(1).1 indexed citations
MacDorman, Karl F. & Hiroshi Ishiguro. (2006). Reply to commentaries on "The uncanny advantage of using androids in social and cognitive science research".27 indexed citations
17.
MacDorman, Karl F., et al.. (2005). 2A1-N-039 人間及びアンドロイドに対する反応の比較によるアンドロイドの人間らしさの評価(認知ロボティクス1,生活を支援するロボメカ技術のメガインテグレーション). 2005. 142.
MacDorman, Karl F.. (2004). Extending the Medium Hypothesis: The Dennett-Mangan Controversy and Beyond. The Journal of mind and behavior. 25(3). 237–258.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.