Robert Geraghty

3.8k total citations · 3 hit papers
108 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Robert Geraghty is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Geraghty has authored 108 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 79 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 57 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 19 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Robert Geraghty's work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (68 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (54 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (19 papers). Robert Geraghty is often cited by papers focused on Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (68 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (54 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (19 papers). Robert Geraghty collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Greece and Ireland. Robert Geraghty's co-authors include Bhaskar Somani, Patrick Jones, Andreas Skolarikos, Amelia Pietropaolo, Lazaros Tzelves, Bhavan Prasad, Paul Cook, Silvia Proietti, Omar M. Aboumarzouk and Kieran Sheahan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and The Journal of Urology.

In The Last Decade

Robert Geraghty

102 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022

2022 133 citations Robert Geraghty, Niall F. Davis et al. profile →
Urological Guidelines for Kidney Stones: Overview and Comprehensive Update

2024 40 citations Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty et al. profile →
European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis

2025 15 citations Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty et al. European Urology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert Geraghty United Kingdom	27	1.6k	1.1k	471	276	249	108	2.2k
Silvia Proietti Italy	28	1.7k 1.1×	1.3k 1.2×	576 1.2×	320 1.2×	147 0.6×	135	2.5k
Sero Andonian Canada	29	1.7k 1.1×	1.0k 1.0×	290 0.6×	838 3.0×	86 0.3×	170	2.7k
Fábio César Miranda Torricelli Brazil	23	1.3k 0.8×	910 0.9×	281 0.6×	290 1.1×	60 0.2×	125	1.8k
Stephen V. Jackman United States	24	1.3k 0.8×	980 0.9×	203 0.4×	417 1.5×	78 0.3×	78	1.9k
Abdurrahim İmamoğlu Türkiye	24	927 0.6×	487 0.5×	205 0.4×	839 3.0×	154 0.6×	150	2.0k
Ravindra Sabnis India	28	1.8k 1.1×	1.3k 1.3×	332 0.7×	532 1.9×	52 0.2×	133	2.3k
Berkan Reşorlu Türkiye	25	1.5k 1.0×	1.3k 1.2×	415 0.9×	356 1.3×	44 0.2×	110	2.0k
Anthony G. Timoney United Kingdom	27	1.9k 1.2×	1.2k 1.1×	922 2.0×	454 1.6×	70 0.3×	82	2.6k
Ali Ünsal Türkiye	28	1.6k 1.1×	1.3k 1.3×	394 0.8×	364 1.3×	22 0.1×	105	2.3k
Olivier Traxer France	18	1.0k 0.7×	738 0.7×	380 0.8×	399 1.4×	40 0.2×	99	1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Geraghty

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Geraghty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Geraghty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Geraghty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Geraghty

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Geraghty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Geraghty. The network helps show where Robert Geraghty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Geraghty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Geraghty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Geraghty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Geraghty. Robert Geraghty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Skolarikos, Andreas, Robert Geraghty, Bhaskar Somani, et al.. (2025). European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis. European Urology. 88(1). 64–75. 15 indexed citations breakdown →

Skolarikos, Andreas, et al.. (2025). Reply to Laura Manuela Olarte Bermúdez, Ana M. Rendón-Garavito, and Juan Francisco Ayala’s Letter to the Editor re: Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty, Bhaskar Somani, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2025;88:64–75. European Urology. 89(1). e21–e22.

Skolarikos, Andreas, Bhaskar Somani, Andreas Neisius, et al.. (2024). Metabolic Evaluation and Recurrence Prevention for Urinary Stone Patients: An EAU Guidelines Update. European Urology. 86(4). 343–363. 18 indexed citations

Geraghty, Robert, Catherine Lovegrove, Sarah Howles, & John A. Sayer. (2024). Role of Genetic Testing in Kidney Stone Disease: A Narrative Review. Current Urology Reports. 25(12). 311–323. 5 indexed citations

Juliebø‐Jones, Patrick, Michelle J. Semins, C. Seitz, et al.. (2024). Management of Kidney Stones in Pregnancy: A Worldwide Survey of Practice Patterns. Journal of Endourology. 38(10). 1092–1096. 2 indexed citations

Ryan, Éanna J., Matthew G. Davey, Ben Creavin, et al.. (2024). Tumour budding as a prognostic biomarker in biopsies and resections of neoadjuvant‐treated rectal adenocarcinoma. Histopathology. 85(2). 224–243. 4 indexed citations

Khalifa, Ahmad, Robert Geraghty, Kalpesh Parmar, et al.. (2023). Oncological Efficacy of Robotic Nephroureterectomy vs. Open and Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Suspected Non-Metastatic UTUC—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers. 15(20). 4926–4926. 4 indexed citations

Geraghty, Robert, Lazaros Tzelves, Panagiotis Mourmouris, et al.. (2023). Does pre‐stenting influence outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. British Journal of Urology. 134(1). 22–30.

Geraghty, Robert, et al.. (2023). Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones — Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?. Current Urology Reports. 24(8). 365–370. 7 indexed citations

10.

Tzelves, Lazaros, Robert Geraghty, Patrick Juliebø‐Jones, et al.. (2023). Complication rate after pediatric shock wave lithotripsy according to Clavien–Dindo grading system: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature. World Journal of Urology. 41(3). 829–835. 3 indexed citations

11.

Geraghty, Robert, et al.. (2023). Use of whole genome sequencing to determine the genetic basis of visceral myopathies including Prune Belly syndrome. PubMed. 2(1). 9–9. 2 indexed citations

12.

Elsayed, Inas, Robert Geraghty, Ahmed Abdalla Mohamedani, et al.. (2022). Evaluating utility and feasibility of mismatch repair testing of colorectal cancer patients in a low-middle-income country. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 10998–10998. 1 indexed citations

13.

Geraghty, Robert, et al.. (2021). Music reduces patient-reported pain and anxiety and should be routinely offered during flexible cystoscopy: Outcomes of a systematic review. Arab Journal of Urology. 19(4). 480–487. 8 indexed citations

14.

Lovegrove, Catherine, et al.. (2021). Natural history of small asymptomatic kidney and residual stones over a long‐term follow‐up: systematic review over 25 years. British Journal of Urology. 129(4). 442–456. 24 indexed citations

15.

Somani, Bhaskar, et al.. (2020). Comparison of Primary and Delayed Ureteroscopy for Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparative Study. Urologia Internationalis. 105(1-2). 90–94. 12 indexed citations

16.

Geraghty, Robert, et al.. (2020). Does chronic hyperglycaemia increase the risk of kidney stone disease? results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 10(1). e032094–e032094. 16 indexed citations

17.

Ryan, Éanna J., Ben Creavin, Michael E. Kelly, et al.. (2018). Correlation of immunohistochemical mismatch repair protein status between colorectal carcinoma endoscopic biopsy and resection specimens. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 71(7). 631–636. 20 indexed citations

18.

Geraghty, Robert, Patrick Jones, & Bhaskar Somani. (2017). Worldwide Trends of Urinary Stone Disease Treatment Over the Last Two Decades: A Systematic Review. Journal of Endourology. 31(6). 547–556. 206 indexed citations

19.

Canney, Aoife, David Kevans, Lai Mun Wang, et al.. (2012). Stage II colonic adenocarcinoma: a detailed study of pT4N0 with emphasis on peritoneal involvement and the role of tumour budding. Histopathology. 61(3). 488–496. 18 indexed citations

20.

Ramzy, Ibrahim, et al.. (1978). Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. Diagnosis by fine needle aspiration.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 22(5). 366–9. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact