Countries where authors publish in Current Urology Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Urology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Urology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Urology Reports more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Current Urology Reports
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Urology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Urology Reports.
About Current Urology Reports
The 1.8k papers published in Current Urology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 24.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Urology Reports usually cover Urology (761 papers), Rheumatology (520 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (720 papers), Surgery (646 papers) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (92 papers) specifically the topics of Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (546 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (409 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (356 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (304 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (187 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (185 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (175 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Urology Reports are Bhaskar Somani, Laurence Klotz, Roger R. Dmochowski, Kevin T. McVary, Sumeet Bhanvadia, David Staskin, Michael Palese, Howard B. Goldman, Daniel A. Shoskes and Jaspreet S. Sandhu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.