Journal of Endourology

6.6k papers and 120.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.6k papers published in Journal of Endourology in the last decades have received a total of 120.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Endourology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4.5k papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (2.2k papers) and Surgery (2.2k papers) specifically the topics of Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (2.5k papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (2.2k papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Endourology are Ralph V. Clayman, Elspeth M. McDougall, Glenn M. Preminger, Mahesh Desai, James E. Lingeman, Stephen Y. Nakada, John D. Denstedt, Demetrius H. Bagley, Ashok K. Hemal and Jeffrey A. Cadeddu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Endourology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Endourology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Endourology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Endourology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Endourology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Endourology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Endourology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025