Amelia Pietropaolo

3.2k total citations
151 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Amelia Pietropaolo is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amelia Pietropaolo has authored 151 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 121 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 77 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 37 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Amelia Pietropaolo's work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (110 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (74 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (37 papers). Amelia Pietropaolo is often cited by papers focused on Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (110 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (74 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (37 papers). Amelia Pietropaolo collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Netherlands. Amelia Pietropaolo's co-authors include Bhaskar Somani, Patrick Jones, Robert Geraghty, Andreas Skolarikos, Omar M. Aboumarzouk, Lily Whitehurst, Thomas Hughes, Silvia Proietti, E. Montanari and Kemal Sarıca and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Surgery and The Journal of Urology.

In The Last Decade

Amelia Pietropaolo

133 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amelia Pietropaolo United Kingdom 24 1.2k 867 445 262 230 151 1.7k
Patrick Jones United Kingdom 25 1.3k 1.0× 849 1.0× 357 0.8× 466 1.8× 170 0.7× 83 1.7k
Junaid Masood United Kingdom 22 762 0.6× 517 0.6× 289 0.6× 290 1.1× 284 1.2× 98 1.4k
Tolga Akman Türkiye 27 1.3k 1.1× 1.1k 1.2× 262 0.6× 368 1.4× 260 1.1× 72 1.9k
Stephen V. Jackman United States 24 1.3k 1.1× 980 1.1× 203 0.5× 238 0.9× 417 1.8× 78 1.9k
Iqbal Singh India 21 613 0.5× 376 0.4× 273 0.6× 306 1.2× 444 1.9× 113 1.3k
Christine Willekes Netherlands 26 499 0.4× 744 0.9× 469 1.1× 167 0.6× 284 1.2× 80 1.7k
I.R. Lange Canada 24 605 0.5× 1.7k 2.0× 1.4k 3.1× 75 0.3× 309 1.3× 50 2.4k
Kourosh Afshar Canada 21 343 0.3× 452 0.5× 58 0.1× 613 2.3× 460 2.0× 79 1.4k
Angela Kribs Germany 33 2.3k 1.9× 1.5k 1.7× 451 1.0× 20 0.1× 831 3.6× 138 3.5k
Emily Hamilton Canada 22 457 0.4× 1.1k 1.3× 692 1.6× 39 0.1× 202 0.9× 94 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Amelia Pietropaolo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amelia Pietropaolo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amelia Pietropaolo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amelia Pietropaolo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amelia Pietropaolo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amelia Pietropaolo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amelia Pietropaolo. The network helps show where Amelia Pietropaolo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amelia Pietropaolo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amelia Pietropaolo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amelia Pietropaolo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amelia Pietropaolo. Amelia Pietropaolo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scarpa, Roberto Mario, et al.. (2025). Indications and Outcomes of Local Anesthetic Retrograde Ureteral Stent Insertion: A Systematic Review from EAU Endourology. Journal of Endourology. 39(9). 930–940.
2.
Pavone, Vito, et al.. (2025). Comparison of Infrapatellar and Suprapatellar Intramedullary Nails with New Clinical Score for Fixation of Tibial Shaft Fractures. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 10(2). 222–222.
3.
Juliebø‐Jones, Patrick, Lazaros Tzelves, Nithesh Naik, et al.. (2025). Current state of AI for shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review from YAU and EAU endourology. World Journal of Urology. 43(1). 429–429. 1 indexed citations
5.
Tsaturyan, Arman, Etienne Xavier Keller, Angelis Peteinaris, et al.. (2024). Fluid dynamics within renal cavities during endoscopic stone surgery: does the position of the flexible ureteroscope and ureteral access sheath affect the outflow rate?. World Journal of Urology. 42(1). 240–240. 3 indexed citations
6.
Vigneswaran, Ganesh, et al.. (2024). A machine learning approach using stone volume to predict stone-free status after ureteroscopy for kidney stones. European Urology Open Science. 59. S41–S42. 3 indexed citations
8.
Pietropaolo, Amelia, et al.. (2024). Transurethral Resection and Other Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for BPH: Would we treat ourselves as we treat our patients? Results from EAU section of Uro-technology (ESUT) decision-making survey among urologists. Editor-in-Chief s Voice List of Authors is an Important Element in a Scientific Publication. 77(2). 243–255. 2 indexed citations
10.
Pietropaolo, Amelia, et al.. (2023). Evolución y perfeccionamiento de técnicas endourológicas (urs y nlpc) sin fluoroscopia. Revisión sistemática de la literatura. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 48(1). 2–10. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hameed, B. M. Zeeshan, et al.. (2023). Current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature. Therapeutic Advances in Urology. 15. 3633522864–3633522864. 1 indexed citations
12.
Cerrato, Clara, Carlotta Nedbal, Vincenzo De Marco, et al.. (2023). Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(13). 4389–4389. 4 indexed citations
13.
Cerrato, Clara, et al.. (2023). Evolving Role of Lasers in Endourology: Past, Present and Future of Lasers. Photonics. 10(6). 635–635. 4 indexed citations
14.
Ventimiglia, Eugenio, Daniele Robesti, Luca Orecchia, et al.. (2023). What to expect from the novel pulsed thulium:YAG laser? A systematic review of endourological applications. World Journal of Urology. 41(11). 3301–3308. 21 indexed citations
15.
Juliebø‐Jones, Patrick, Amelia Pietropaolo, Anne‐Françoise Spinoit, et al.. (2021). Rules and regulations for a pregnant endourologist: the European perspective. World Journal of Urology. 40(3). 857–864. 5 indexed citations
17.
Somani, Bhaskar, et al.. (2020). Comparison of Primary and Delayed Ureteroscopy for Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparative Study. Urologia Internationalis. 105(1-2). 90–94. 12 indexed citations
18.
Reeves, Thomas, Amelia Pietropaolo, & Bhaskar Somani. (2019). Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation Is Safe and Tends to Improve Renal Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Prospective Outcomes with a Minimum Follow-Up of 6 Months. Journal of Endourology. 34(4). 423–428. 3 indexed citations
20.
Mearini, Luigi, et al.. (2013). A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL: ABDOMINAL VS LAPAROSCOPIC SACROPEXY FOR ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 811–811.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026