Robert G. Kooser

19 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Robert G. Kooser
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Biophysics 197
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 88
  • Electrochemistry 40
  • Spectroscopy 93
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 101
Replace Lian Pin Hwang with:
Lian Pin Hwang Taiwan
James S. Hwang Saudi Arabia
Shui Pong Van United States
B. S. Prabhananda India
James S. Vincent United States
Wulf Hofbauer Germany
Julien Gendell United States
G. J. Sloan United States
R. Biehl Germany
Yasuhiko Gondo Japan
Robert G. Kooser relative to Lian Pin Hwang Taiwan Lian Pin Hwang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lian Pin Hwang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Kooser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Kooser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Kooser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Kooser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Kooser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Kooser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Kooser. The network helps show where Robert G. Kooser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Kooser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Kooser Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Kooser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969129
2 196993
3 199226
4 199221
5 199318
6 196815
7 197814
8 198813
9
Pour une éthique de l'enseignement des sciences
19858
10 19877
11 19966
12 19885
13 19945
14
Value Presuppositions in Science Textbooks. A Critical Bibliography.
19814
15 19833
16 19823
17 19923
18 19932
19 19762
20
Cubes, Eights, and Dots: A Student's Guide to the Octet Rule and Its History.
19831

About Robert G. Kooser

Robert G. Kooser is a scholar working on Biophysics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electron Spin Resonance Studies (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (3 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (2 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (197 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (88 citations), Electrochemistry (40 citations), Spectroscopy (93 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (101 citations). Robert G. Kooser has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jack H. Freed, Michael P. Eastman, Mriganka Das, Paul Wright, R.B. Clarkson, John G. Dorsey, J. Gorse, Amos O. Daré, Billy W. Geer and Robert R. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Biochemical Genetics, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact