Jack H. Freed
- Biophysics top 0.01%
- Spectroscopy top 0.02%
- Materials Chemistry top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Peter P. BorbatGeorge K. FraenkelCarl F. PolnaszekG. V. BrunoSunil SaxenaEva MeirovitchDavid E. BudilLian‐Pin Hwang
- Topics
- Electron Spin Resonance Studies (229 papers)Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (135 papers)Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (98 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelItaly
In The Last Decade
Jack H. Freed
413 papers receiving 20.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
- Biophysics 10.1k
- Spectroscopy 6.2k
- Materials Chemistry 6.0k
- Molecular Biology 5.9k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 5.8k
Countries citing papers authored by Jack H. Freed
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack H. Freed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack H. Freed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack H. Freed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack H. Freed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack H. Freed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack H. Freed. The network helps show where Jack H. Freed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack H. Freed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack H. Freed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack H. Freed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack H. Freed. Jack H. Freed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 83 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 121 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | Application of the high-sensitivity pulsed dipolar ESR spectroscopy to membrane protein structure and function | 0 |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 89 | |
| 18 | 51 | |
| 19 | 53 | |
| 20 | Two-Dimensional Electron-Spin Resonance | 8 |
About Jack H. Freed
Jack H. Freed is a scholar working on Biophysics, Spectroscopy and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 420 papers that have together received 21.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electron Spin Resonance Studies (229 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (135 papers) and Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (98 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (10.1k citations), Spectroscopy (6.2k citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (2.7k citations). Jack H. Freed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Peter P. Borbat, George K. Fraenkel, Carl F. Polnaszek, G. V. Bruno, Sunil Saxena, Eva Meirovitch, David E. Budil, Lian‐Pin Hwang, Keith Earle and J. Boiden Pedersen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.