Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments
19941.5k citationsRobert Forsythe et al.Games and Economic Behaviorprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Forsythe
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Forsythe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Forsythe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Forsythe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Forsythe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Forsythe. The network helps show where Robert Forsythe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Forsythe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Forsythe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Forsythe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Forsythe. Robert Forsythe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Berg, Joyce E., Robert Forsythe, Forrest D. Nelson, & Thomas A. Rietz. (2000). Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 742–751.100 indexed citations
Cooper, Russell, Douglas V. DeJong, Robert Forsythe, & Thomas W. Ross. (1991). Forward Induction in the Battle of Sexes Games. American Economic Review. 83(5). 1303–1316.91 indexed citations
11.
Forsythe, Robert, John Kennan, & Barry Sopher. (1991). An Experimental Analysis of Strikes in Bargaining Games with One-Sided Private Information. American Economic Review. 81(1). 253–278.58 indexed citations
12.
Cooper, Russell, et al.. (1989). COMMUNICATION IN THE BATTLE OF THE SEXES GAME. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.22 indexed citations
Baron, David P. & Robert Forsythe. (1979). Models of the Firm and International Trade under Uncertainty. American Economic Review. 69(4). 565–574.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.