R. Mark Isaac
- Safety Research top 0.02%
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- General Decision Sciences top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- James M. WalkerCharles R. PlottArlington W. WilliamsDuncan JamesSusan ThomasKenneth McCueTimothy C. SalmonT. K. Ahn
- Topics
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (41 papers)Auction Theory and Applications (32 papers)Economic theories and models (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaCanada
In The Last Decade
R. Mark Isaac
71 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Safety Research 3.1k
- Economics and Econometrics 1.8k
- Management Science and Operations Research 1.5k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
- General Decision Sciences 893
Countries citing papers authored by R. Mark Isaac
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Mark Isaac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Mark Isaac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Mark Isaac more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Mark Isaac
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Mark Isaac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Mark Isaac. The network helps show where R. Mark Isaac may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Mark Isaac
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Mark Isaac. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Mark Isaac based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Mark Isaac. R. Mark Isaac is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | Experiments investigating market power | 5 |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 142 | |
| 10 | Emissions permit experiments | 0 |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 451 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | Natural Monopoly and the Contestable Markets Hypothesis: Some Preliminary Results from Laboratory Experiments | 2 |
| 19 | 59 | |
| 20 | Research in experimental economics : a research annual | 3 |
About R. Mark Isaac
R. Mark Isaac is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Decision Sciences and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 74 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (41 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (32 papers) and Economic theories and models (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (893 citations), Safety Research (3.1k citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (1.5k citations). R. Mark Isaac has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James M. Walker, Charles R. Plott, Arlington W. Williams, Duncan James, Susan Thomas, Kenneth McCue, Timothy C. Salmon, T. K. Ahn, Stanley S. Reynolds and David Schmidtz. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, The Quarterly Journal of Economics and Journal of Political Economy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.