William R. Schoedel

708 citations
29 papers · 136 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
Biblical Studies and Interpretation (17 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (13 papers)Theology and Canon Law Studies (6 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

William R. Schoedel

22 papers receiving 75 citations

Peers

William R. Schoedel
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Religious studies 104
  • Sociology and Political Science 69
  • Archeology 55
  • Classics 27
  • Anthropology 23
Replace Ronald E. Heine with:
Ronald E. Heine United States
Heinz Schreckenberg Germany
Hans von Campenhausen
Robert D. Sider
R. P. C. Hanson United Kingdom
Rowan A. Greer
E. P. Meijering
Alois Grillmeier United Kingdom
Arthur Vööbus United States
Pierre-Maurice Bogaert
William R. Schoedel relative to Ronald E. Heine United States Ronald E. Heine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ronald E. Heine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William R. Schoedel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Schoedel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Schoedel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Schoedel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Schoedel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Schoedel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Schoedel. The network helps show where William R. Schoedel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William R. Schoedel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William R. Schoedel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William R. Schoedel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William R. Schoedel. William R. Schoedel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 8
2 20
3 1
4 0
5
Ignatius of Antioch
12
6 2
7
Early Christian literature and the classical intellectual tradition : in honorem Robert M. Grant
13
8 5
9 3
10 4
11 16
12 1
13 2
14 1
15 2
16
Polycarp, Martyrdom of Polycarp, fragments of papias
5
17 1
18 2
19 7
20 1

About William R. Schoedel

William R. Schoedel is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Classics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 136 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (17 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (13 papers) and Theology and Canon Law Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (104 citations), Classics (27 citations) and Archeology (55 citations). William R. Schoedel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carolyn Osiek, Elaine H. Pagels, Helmut Koester, Robert M. Grant, Abraham J. Malherbe, Robert L. Wilken, Gerd Lüdemann, E. P. Meijering, Robert Joly and M. R. James. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Journal of Biblical Literature and Vigiliae Christianae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026