Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Burchfield
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Burchfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Burchfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Burchfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Burchfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Burchfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Burchfield. The network helps show where Robert Burchfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Burchfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Burchfield.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Burchfield based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Burchfield. Robert Burchfield is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fowler, H. W. & Robert Burchfield. (2004). Fowler's modern English usage. Oxford University Press eBooks.42 indexed citations
Burchfield, Robert. (1992). Points of View: Aspects of Present-Day English. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
6.
Robinson, Fred C. & Robert Burchfield. (1990). Studies in Lexicography. The Yearbook of English Studies. 20. 209–209.14 indexed citations
7.
Burchfield, Robert, et al.. (1988). Words : for Robert Burchfield's sixty-fifth birthday.20 indexed citations
8.
Burchfield, Robert. (1987). The Compact edition of the Oxford English dictionary : complete text reproduced micrographically. Oxford University Press eBooks.26 indexed citations
9.
Burchfield, Robert. (1987). A Supplement to the Oxford English dictionary volumes I-IV. Clarendon Press eBooks.18 indexed citations
10.
Burchfield, Robert. (1986). The New Zealand pocket Oxford dictionary. Oxford University Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
11.
Burchfield, Robert, et al.. (1981). Miscellaneous Reports on Iowa Archaeology.
Burchfield, Robert. (1973). DATA COLLECTING AND RESEARCH. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 211(1). 99–103.3 indexed citations
17.
Pyles, Thomas & Robert Burchfield. (1971). The Porn Is Green. American Speech. 46(3/4). 237–237.1 indexed citations
18.
Francis, W. Nelson & Robert Burchfield. (1965). The English language,: An introduction; background for writing. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
19.
Burchfield, Robert. (1965). The English Language. Americanae (AECID Library).34 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.