1.7k total citations 11 papers, 217 citations indexed
About
H. W. Fowler is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Paleontology and Ecological Modeling.
According to data from OpenAlex, H. W. Fowler has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 217 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Language and Linguistics, 1 paper in Paleontology and 1 paper in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in H. W. Fowler's work include Lexicography and Language Studies (5 papers), Science and Climate Studies (1 paper) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (1 paper). H. W. Fowler is often cited by papers focused on Lexicography and Language Studies (5 papers), Science and Climate Studies (1 paper) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (1 paper). H. W. Fowler collaborates with scholars based in . H. W. Fowler's co-authors include Barbara M. H. Strang, Robert Burchfield, Jeremy Butterfield, J. B. Sykes, C. T. Onions and David Crystal and has published in prestigious journals such as Copeia, The Modern Language Review and Clarendon Press eBooks.
Citations per year, relative to H. W. Fowler H. W. Fowler (= 1×)
peers
Richard J. Rundell
Countries citing papers authored by H. W. Fowler
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of H. W. Fowler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. W. Fowler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. W. Fowler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. W. Fowler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. W. Fowler. The network helps show where H. W. Fowler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. W. Fowler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. W. Fowler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. W. Fowler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. W. Fowler. H. W. Fowler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fowler, H. W., et al.. (2011). The concise Oxford dictionary of current English : 1911 first edition. Oxford University Press eBooks.
3.
Fowler, H. W. & Robert Burchfield. (2004). Fowler's modern English usage. Oxford University Press eBooks.42 indexed citations
4.
Fowler, H. W., et al.. (2001). The new pocket Oxford dictionary. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
5.
Fowler, H. W., et al.. (1991). The Oxford handy dictionary. Medical Entomology and Zoology.5 indexed citations
6.
Sykes, J. B., et al.. (1976). The concise Oxford dictionary of current English : based on the Oxford English dictionary and its supplements. Clarendon Press eBooks.7 indexed citations
7.
Fowler, H. W., et al.. (1973). The Oxford universal dictionary illustrated : on historical principles. Medical Entomology and Zoology.5 indexed citations
8.
Fowler, H. W., et al.. (1968). The Oxford universal dictionary illustrated : an illustrated edition of the Shorter Oxford English dictionary. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
9.
Strang, Barbara M. H. & H. W. Fowler. (1966). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. The Modern Language Review. 61(2). 264–264.125 indexed citations
10.
Fowler, H. W., et al.. (1964). The concise Oxford dictionary of current English : based on the Oxford dictionary. Clarendon Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.