Pain Practice

1.7k papers and 33.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Pain Practice in the last decades have received a total of 33.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Pain Practice usually cover Pharmacology (769 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (598 papers) and Surgery (535 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (719 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (449 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (320 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pain Practice are P. Prithvi Raj, Nagy Mekhail, Maarten van Kleef, Jan Van Zundert, Rod S Taylor, Robert J. Gatchel, Ronald Melzack, Craig T. Hartrick, Joseph V. Pergolizzi and Alesia Sadosky.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pain Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pain Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pain Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Pain Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pain Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pain Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pain Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025