Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Samson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Samson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Samson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Samson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Samson. The network helps show where Rob Samson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rob Samson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rob Samson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rob Samson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rob Samson. Rob Samson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Samson, Rob, et al.. (2004). Spoilage fungi in the industrial processing of food.. 339–356.29 indexed citations
4.
Egmond, Hans P. van, Rob Samson, E. S. Hoekstra, & Jens C. Frisvad. (2004). Mycotoxins: detection, reference materials and regulation.. 332–338.9 indexed citations
5.
Filtenborg, O., Jens C. Frisvad, & Rob Samson. (2000). Specific association of fungi to foods and influence of physical environmental factors.. 306–320.38 indexed citations
6.
Samson, Rob, et al.. (1999). Food microbiology and food safety into the next millennium. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 237–243.34 indexed citations
7.
Samson, Rob, et al.. (1999). Food microbiology and food safety into the next millennium : proceedings of the seventeenth international conference of the International Committee on Food Microbiology and Hygiene (ICFMH), Veldhoven, The Netherlands, 13-17 September 1999. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.5 indexed citations
Nolard, N., Hugues Béguin, Rob Samson, et al.. (1994). Mycological survey in dwellings and factories: application to diagnosis of extrinsic allergic alveolitis.. 201–209.1 indexed citations
12.
Hyvärinen, Anne, A.‐L. Pasanen, Tiina Reponen, et al.. (1994). Fungi and bacteria in normal and mouldy dwellings.. 163–168.6 indexed citations
13.
Norbäck, Dan, Christer Edling, Gunilla Wieslander, et al.. (1994). Asthma symptoms and the sick building syndrome - the significance of microorganisms in the indoor environment.. 229–239.15 indexed citations
14.
Gravesen, S., Rob Samson, B. Flannigan, et al.. (1994). Allergic and non-allergic manifestations related to indoor fungal exposure - management of cases.. 241–248.6 indexed citations
15.
Larsen, Thomas Ostenfeld, Jens C. Frisvad, Rob Samson, et al.. (1994). Production of volatiles and presence of mycotoxins in conidia of common indoor penicillia and aspergilli.. 251–279.21 indexed citations
16.
Frisvad, Jens C. & Rob Samson. (1991). Filamentous fungi in foods and feeds: ecology, spoilage, and mycotoxin production. 31–68.52 indexed citations
17.
Frisvad, Jens C., Rob Samson, & J. Chełkowski. (1991). Mycotoxins produced by species of Penicillium and Aspergillus occurring in cereals.. 441–476.41 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.