Rob Latham
Impact in
- Philosophy top 10%
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
-
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
Papers in
-
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction 4
-
- Literature and Culture Studies 1
- Modern American Literature Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Malcolm Miles (1 shared paper)Azade Seyhan (1 shared paper)Kevin R. McNamara (1 shared paper)Nick Bentley (1 shared paper)Bart Keunen (1 shared paper)Susan Stephens (1 shared paper)Antonis Balasopoulos (1 shared paper)James R. Giles (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Science Fiction Studies (3 papers)Extrapolation (2 papers)American book review/The American book review (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (1 paper)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Rob Latham
8 papers receiving 39 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Philosophy 18
- Cultural Studies 12
- Literature and Literary Theory 16
- Health Informatics 1
- General Social Sciences 2
Countries citing papers authored by Rob Latham
This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Latham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Latham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Latham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Latham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Latham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Latham. The network helps show where Rob Latham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Rob Latham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 4 | Do Metaphors Dream of Literal Sheep? A Science-Fictional Theory of Representation | 2012 | 4 |
| 5 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 0 |
About Rob Latham
Rob Latham is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 53 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (4 papers), Literature and Culture Studies (1 paper), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), Literary and Philosophical Studies (1 paper), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper) and Modern American Literature Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (18 citations), Cultural Studies (12 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (16 citations), Health Informatics (1 citation) and General Social Sciences (2 citations). Rob Latham has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Miles, Azade Seyhan, Kevin R. McNamara, Nick Bentley, Bart Keunen, Susan Stephens, Antonis Balasopoulos, James R. Giles, Arnold Weinstein and Karen Newman. Their work appears in journals such as Science Fiction Studies, Extrapolation, American book review/The American book review, Cambridge University Press eBooks and Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.