R.J. Winder

752 citations
17 papers · 581 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

R.J. Winder

17 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

R.J. Winder
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Ophthalmology 129
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 262
  • Orthodontics 29
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 125
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 139
Replace Zhen Tang with:
Zhen Tang China
Jens Kowal Switzerland
Faraz Oloumi Canada
Basant Kumar India
Taran Tatla United Kingdom
Tharindu De Silva United States
Stefan Saur Switzerland
Draženko Babić Netherlands
Javed Ahmed United Kingdom
Gregor S. Reiter Austria
R.J. Winder relative to Zhen Tang China Zhen Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Zhen Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.J. Winder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.J. Winder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.J. Winder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.J. Winder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.J. Winder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.J. Winder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.J. Winder. The network helps show where R.J. Winder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R.J. Winder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.J. Winder Line = papers co-authored together R.J. Winder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2009188
2 200779
3 200354
4 200454
5 201048
6 200732
7 200224
8 201323
9 200420
10 201119
11 200714
12 201313
13 20044
14 20063
15 20143
16 20102
17 20141

About R.J. Winder

R.J. Winder is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Computational Mechanics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (6 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (4 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (129 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (262 citations), Orthodontics (29 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (125 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (139 citations). R.J. Winder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include P M Hart, Philip Morrow, Zhonghua Sun, Peter K. Ellis, D G Hirst, Tron A. Darvann, David G. Hirst, Peter T. Kennedy, Lüder C. Busch and Ciaren Graham. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Endovascular Therapy, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Journal of Radiological Protection, The Imaging Science Journal and Abdominal Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact