R.J. vanGlabbeek
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Software top 10%
- Hardware and Architecture
- Topics
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers)Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers)
- Journals
- Lecture notes in computer scienceInformation and ComputationUvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
R.J. vanGlabbeek
9 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 296
- Artificial Intelligence 247
- Computer Networks and Communications 61
- Software 50
- Hardware and Architecture 28
Countries citing papers authored by R.J. vanGlabbeek
This map shows the geographic impact of R.J. vanGlabbeek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.J. vanGlabbeek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.J. vanGlabbeek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R.J. vanGlabbeek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.J. vanGlabbeek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.J. vanGlabbeek. The network helps show where R.J. vanGlabbeek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.J. vanGlabbeek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.J. vanGlabbeek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.J. vanGlabbeek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R.J. vanGlabbeek. R.J. vanGlabbeek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The difference between splitting in n and n + 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 171 | |
| 3 | The refinement theorem for ST-bisimulation semantics | 33 |
| 4 | Reactive, generative, and stratified models of probabilistic processes | 3 |
| 5 | 70 | |
| 6 | Partial order semantics for refinement of actions : neither necessary nor always sufficient but appropriate when used with care | 2 |
| 7 | Branching time and abstraction in bisimulation semantics | 38 |
| 8 | Refinement in branching time semantics | 18 |
| 9 | An interpolation theorem in equational logic | 11 |
| 10 | Merge and termination in process algebra | 1 |
About R.J. vanGlabbeek
R.J. vanGlabbeek is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (296 citations), Software (50 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (247 citations). R.J. vanGlabbeek has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Scott A. Smolka, Bernhard Steffen, W. P. Weijland, Ursula Goltz, Frits Vaandrager and Chris Tofts. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Information and Computation and UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.