Mila Majster-Cederbaum
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Hardware and Architecture top 10%
- Software top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christel BaierMarkus RoggenbachHarald FecherJinzhao WuVerena WolfChristian LambertzGregor GößlerJoseph Sifakis
- Topics
- Formal Methods in Verification (35 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (20 papers)Petri Nets in System Modeling (17 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaTheoretical Computer ScienceJournal of Computer and System Sciences
In The Last Decade
Mila Majster-Cederbaum
43 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 261
- Artificial Intelligence 190
- Computer Networks and Communications 66
- Hardware and Architecture 46
- Software 45
Countries citing papers authored by Mila Majster-Cederbaum
This map shows the geographic impact of Mila Majster-Cederbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mila Majster-Cederbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mila Majster-Cederbaum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mila Majster-Cederbaum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mila Majster-Cederbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mila Majster-Cederbaum. The network helps show where Mila Majster-Cederbaum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mila Majster-Cederbaum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mila Majster-Cederbaum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mila Majster-Cederbaum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mila Majster-Cederbaum. Mila Majster-Cederbaum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Interaction Models for Biochemical Reactions | 1 |
| 6 | Deciding Liveness in Component-Based Systems is NP-hard | 2 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | On two different Characterizations of Bisimulation. | 1 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Mila Majster-Cederbaum
Mila Majster-Cederbaum is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Hardware and Architecture and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 45 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (35 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (20 papers) and Petri Nets in System Modeling (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (261 citations), Software (45 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (46 citations). Mila Majster-Cederbaum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Christel Baier, Markus Roggenbach, Harald Fecher, Jinzhao Wu, Verena Wolf, Christian Lambertz, Gregor Gößler, Joseph Sifakis, Susanne Graf and Felix Freiling. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Theoretical Computer Science and Journal of Computer and System Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.