Replace Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science with:
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer ScienceUnited Kingdom
Acta InformaticaUnited States
Science of Computer ProgrammingUnited States
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and HumansUnited States
The Computer JournalUnited Kingdom
Journal of Computer and System SciencesUnited States
Operations ResearchUnited States
Fundamenta InformaticaePoland
Software Practice and ExperienceUnited States
ACM Transactions on Mathematical SoftwareUnited States
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer ScienceUnited KingdomView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Information and Computation
Information and Computation · 1×
×0.725.6kAI
×0.618.8kCTM
×0.810.3kCNC
×2.110.5kIS
×2.09.7kSOFTW
Citations per year, relative to Information and Computation
Information and Computation · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Information and Computation
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information and Computation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information and Computation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information and Computation more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Information and Computation
This network shows the impact of papers published in Information and Computation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information and Computation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.